Posted on 06/07/2006 4:51:37 PM PDT by new yorker 77
I didn't know Ann was ever married.
My post was posted to point out the irony and hypocrisy.
I'm not supporting what she says, but she sure does it with a lot more class (classless as it is) than the psychophants here.
But then she is a professional, the people getting off on putting her down appear to be self-absorbed amateurs embarrassing themselves in public. Not a felony.
In boxing matches do they typically kick the opponent in the crotch?
I don't approve of these widows, but Ann Coulter's reply is mean-spirited and counter-productive. Ann-bots will applaud her, liberals will spit, and the majority in the middle will be disgusted and alienated from conservativism. Rather than criticising these women's appearance and suggesting their marriages were a sham she should instead be rationally discussing the issue, but I guess that doesn't sell many books.
No, but in real life it will simply remove one of his legs.
It will sell a lot of books for her. Which in the end is the only thing that will matter to Ann.
Annbots!
Its funny, so many willing to fall all over themselves making excuses for crassness, just so long as its the crassness we believe in.
I think her style is counterproductive to her arguments.
You have an adam's apple!?!?!??!
LOL
Many women do, but not the Terror Whores. They made it perfectly clear that they have only a partisan interest.
and your point is......??????
Absolutely, and some of us don't forget.
How do we know they weren't planning on killing their husbands? How do we know they didn't eat their newborn babies? How do we know they don't sacrifice black cats to Satan in their basements?
That nonsense is just baseless slander.
I think it is backfiring or perhaps smoldering until November!
"Because, as members of the Church of Liberalism you are supposed to venerate the Saint Jerseys."
Really, does she say that? Everything I've read today discussed her quotes with no context. If she is indeed making such a point she probably would have been better off doing it without the, in my opinion, personal attacks. Then the point might be being addressed instead of the attacks.
But then, I'm probably not a REAL conservative anyway. At least, that is what I've been told recently by those who see this fight differently. Sigh.
Sorry, but Ann screwed up. In a spectacular way.
She damaged the conservative message, her spew was as nasty as lib-spew. We know when the libs do it it doesn't work, but when Ann does it, it's magical elixir? No. She is an embarrassment and a detractor. If you think her speculation about the dead American husbands perhaps wanting to leave their wives and children HELPED matters, I think you are being disingenuous.
OMIGOSH did Ann make these socialist slime reporters forget about Haditha and convicting our brave marines? Thanks for taking one for the team Ann.
It may not make sense to you, but everyone has a different "calling" in politics. Granted, I personally would not respond as Ann does, I think there is a need to have people like her challenging the leftists in a way that only she can do it. She serves a purpose, and she is doing it exactly as she intends and getting the response she wants from it.
Amen, Baby!!
"But I'm not sure that it moves the ball down the field, which is actually what I'd like to see happen. We have to convince a fair number of THEM that we are correct. That is best done through patient, persistent, clear discussion of ideas.
But then, I'm probably not a REAL conservative anyway. At least, that is what I've been told recently by those who see this fight differently. Sigh."
It's as if I wrote it myself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.