To: NicknamedBob
Okay, if that's the way you want it, Bob. BTW, those stones were brought to the pyramids as powder and reconstituted into blocks in situ ... not that much rope was needed.
58 posted on
06/07/2006 7:23:42 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: MHGinTN
I have a different theory.
59 posted on
06/07/2006 7:24:54 PM PDT by
NicknamedBob
(I grew up so long ago that being grown-up was more fun than being a kid!)
To: MHGinTN
The reason they used huge blocks of stone was to make them so big and massive that anyone wanting building materials would more likely just quarry new stone than mess with the ones in the pyramid. They had reason for thinking of that.
In Egypt, rope and stone were available. Wood was probably relatively scarce, and was used in a manner similar to bridge construction "falsework" more than as building materials itself.
My theory is that they used a basic and commonsensical technique for moving the stones, as described here...
The pyramids were much more fun, the competition brisk,
We raced those stones on up the ramps and didnt mind the risk.
I laugh to think about the thoughts that we used rays.
Life was so much simpler then, its how we filled our days,
With building competitions, instead of fighting wars,
Why else would we pile up stones, without a trace of doors?
Wed clap an arc of wood upon each face of cubic block,
And then wed get it up to go, by pushing up the rock.
Then toss a rope around it, and take it for a stroll,
Let me tell you, we knew then, just how to rock and roll.
62 posted on
06/07/2006 7:35:40 PM PDT by
NicknamedBob
(I grew up so long ago that being grown-up was more fun than being a kid!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson