Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GrandEagle

True, but a uniform recognition of the definition of marriage was a REQUIREMENT for statehood. Are you saying that once Utah became a state it would have been justified to pull out of its agreement and re-legalize polygamy? You can't be saying that.


11 posted on 06/07/2006 11:02:04 AM PDT by RaiderNation1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RaiderNation1
True, but a uniform recognition of the definition of marriage was a REQUIREMENT for statehood.
No, uniform recognition of the definition of marriage was NOT the requirement. Not having polygamy was the requirement, and no - since it was a condition of statehood, they could not back out and re-legalize it. However, such was NOT a condition, say in New York.

Cordially,
GE
13 posted on 06/07/2006 11:08:47 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson