Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
It is only necessary for a government to mandate respect through force of law

So, using THAT theory, no laws are necessary at all, as a criminal act, such as assault, means that the victim deserved it?

Pretty weak on the argument weight, isn't it?

No one is arguing on behalf of "the government" here; we're talking about respect of the NATION and it's SYMBOL. The option is to attend PRIVATE SCHOOL, not to desecrate tradition and honor and respect for the NATION and its heritage....to enter a public place and DEMAND special treatment is the crux of the situation, not the "right" to object on moral or religious grounds. To object simply to be contrary is a Leftist ploy or the effort of an attention-seeker....in the case cited, I would suspect that the objection is merely self-serving to gain attention, and NOT a statement of not wanting to be an American. If it were the latter, don't let the door hit you in the a@# as you leave, because you have the FREEDOM to leave anytime you want in this country.

THAT is a "right".

57 posted on 06/02/2006 3:53:16 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: traditional1
So, using THAT theory, no laws are necessary at all, as a criminal act, such as assault, means that the victim deserved it?

Laws against assault are not meant to foster respect for a country. Your analogy is faulty.
59 posted on 06/02/2006 4:14:39 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson