Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman

It seems to me that the fact that he got out there with a contrarian explanation at a time when uniformitarianism reigned was just too radical for establishment thinkers. No doubt he had a few wild and wooleys, but at least give the man credit for calling the fundamental mechanics what they were/are. When you reflect on it, even hallowed science, in every epoch, essentially pulls their theories out of their butts, too - though highly educated butts they may be.


175 posted on 06/02/2006 7:03:25 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Wisdom of the Leftist Tao, No.379: Women are men, men are children and children are adults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: WorkingClassFilth
"It seems to me that the fact that he got out there with a contrarian explanation at a time when uniformitarianism reigned was just too radical for establishment thinkers."

But his claims were all garbage. They have not panned out. At all. He did no research, made no observations.

"No doubt he had a few wild and wooleys, but at least give the man credit for calling the fundamental mechanics what they were/are."

He got the mechanics completely wrong. What was he right about? Nothing.

"When you reflect on it, even hallowed science, in every epoch, essentially pulls their theories out of their butts, too - though highly educated butts they may be."

No, they do nothing of the sort. They make observations and test their claims against the evidence. Velikovsky did nothing of the sort. He made things up based on a crappy reading of ancient myths. He was a loon.
176 posted on 06/02/2006 7:07:41 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson