To: rhema
That article says absolutely nothing of value. It identifies an obvious problem, but offers no solution. That, and the plural of 'curriculum' is 'curricula,' not 'curriculums.'
So much for that superior education.
5 posted on
05/29/2006 6:21:38 PM PDT by
RedBeaconNY
(If you want to know what God thinks of money, look at the people He gave it to.)
To: RedBeaconNY
Sure it offers a solution. Separating boys from girls in classrooms, right at the end. And giving them different curriculA too.
8 posted on
05/29/2006 6:28:37 PM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
To: RedBeaconNY
Yeah, but what is the plural of moose?
14 posted on
05/29/2006 6:34:31 PM PDT by
NavVet
(O)
To: RedBeaconNY
Actually, it advocates single-sex classrooms where lessons are taught the way boys or girls learn.
To: RedBeaconNY
I thought it was a well written and thoughtful article. It does offer a partial solution - single sex classrooms.
FYI:
"Cirriculums" is an accepted plural form for "cirriculum" (My Webster's dictionary).
To: RedBeaconNY
Here is my solution---let boys be boys.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson