This is what I was going to say but I'm glad someone beat me too it. Until the movie comes out for at least the final product is reviewed, there is no way to know what it will be about.
World War II is my area of study as I work to complete my Masters. I don't oppose a movie showing the battle from the Japanese perspective so as long as it is historically accurate and does not attempt to make the Japanese out to the good guys or victims of the evil Americans.
"Until the movie comes out or at least the final product is reviewed..."
Exactly
I'm a bit dismayed at the rush to judgment.
Unless Eastward has changed from the man I knew when I Lived in Carmel - I will trust him and reserve judgment until I see it...
They were late in the game, and felt cheated by the Treaty of Versailles. But then they invaded Manchuria, they raped Nanking. We cut off their steel and their oil. They retaliated. Perhaps we can depict Japanese Imperial soldiers claiming their right to Chinese territory, but only in its jingoistic, xenophobic context.
We can justify the attack on Pearl Harbor on that, and the invasion of Attu and Kiska. We can see them justifying themselves in the Bataan Death March and the Owens Stanley Range, too. We can see the Burma railroad, and how they built that.
They were brave, and resourceful. No one can deny that. But we have to see those attributes in the light of their armed assault on the entire Pacific Rim, and their complete disregard for the life of anyone not Japanese.
How this will make the World War II Japanese look like anything other than Satan, I can't see.