Darwinists take the problems of origin and lack of evidence of transitional species on faith buttressed by a few miserable conjectures. They wince and retreat from the bright harsh light offered by other disciplines, such as mathematics/combinatorics, that show how outrageously implausible their faith claims are.
Darwinists deceitfully malcharacterize Intelligent Design theory as superstition and metaphysics when in fact it is fully rational (arguing solutions by best inference) and based wholly and solidly in natural phenomena (information, Shannon entropy, and artifacts of intelligence and design).
Darwinists are in a panic because their miserable and shabby faith claims are being challenged by strong and original thinkers who are asking why evolution, if it is science, needs to be propped up and defended by the state from criticism.
Judge Jones of Kitzmiller infame, a lightweight, embarrasingly unoriginal and petty little thug of a thinker, thought he could defeat the honest critics of intellectually bankrupt Darwinism by judicial fiat. But how did a theory of science come to require the protection of the ACLU and the state?
Judge Jones and the intellectually slothful high priests of Darwinism would do well to remember Thomas Jefferson's admonition: “It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.”