[connectthedots]

I don't argue with people who can't see the obvious.

[js1138]

Let's just say you have an interesting history of predicting legal outcomes. Interesting for those of us who have been here a while.

[Dimensio]

I don't argue with people who can't see the obvious.

I do not see how my conclusion is not obvious. You predicted a verdict in the Dover trial. Later, you denied making any such prediction.

If you wish to argue that you did not actually predict a verdict, then you will need to explain how your statement does not constitute a prediction. Merely repeating a denial in spite of information to the contrary does not change reality.