Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio

If you read my entire post at your link, you will see that, I made no unqualified statements as to how Jones would rule. I know far too much about the way judges work to think that they will actually accurately state the facts or properly appl;y them to the law.


141 posted on 05/28/2006 12:41:01 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: connectthedots
If you read my entire post at your link, you will see that, I made no unqualified statements as to how Jones would rule.

You stated that you believed that Jones would rule in favor of the defendants, which was a prediction regarding the outcome. When making the statement, you did not offer any qualifiers. After the ruling, you denied making any such predictions. Claiming that my reading comprehension "sucks" does not change what you stated in the past.
143 posted on 05/28/2006 12:46:05 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson