Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Indy Pendance

Look it's real simple BUSH is the head of enforcement in the US. He directs the FBI, the ICE, the border patrol. He is also suppose to be a Republican that respects National security. You say Clinton could have prevent 9/11? maybe he could but what happens when the next terrorist attack is caused by people crossing from the Southern border? Will you say the same about Bush. That he should have seen it coming? Hell 80% of the country sees it coming. But Bush is so in the pocket of Big Business that he will not put National Security in front of the wants of the Business elite. And make no mistake this is what the debate is about. The wants of the elite for cheap labor and the need of the population to be secure within their country.


66 posted on 05/22/2006 9:22:18 PM PDT by unseen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: unseen
Yes, Clinton should have seen it coming, so should have Reagan (oh, amnesty), so should have ford or carter or Johnson or Nixon, etc. And yes, I'll blame them as much as bush, but to solely fault bush when congress and the senate refuse to uphold the EXISTING laws, is irresponsible. And those here who are on the feeding bash bush trough are as guilty as any dem.
68 posted on 05/22/2006 9:32:33 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson