Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/21/2006 12:19:26 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: quidnunc

Low ebb? Some would call it, the calm before the storm.


2 posted on 05/21/2006 12:21:39 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (* Steroids are just a way to "level the playing field.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Clueless does not being to describe this nitwit.


3 posted on 05/21/2006 12:22:17 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

I have my doubts. In fact the writer seems to be experiencing a bit of denial.


4 posted on 05/21/2006 12:23:47 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Isn't that just like a conservative, to be always looking to the past to make sense of the present?

Yeah, it's called remembering history so as not to repeat it. Conservatives need to remember that when they govern as conservatives, they win. When they try to govern like big-government liberal democrats, they lose.
5 posted on 05/21/2006 12:24:41 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Please see the results of the recent Pennsylvania elections.


6 posted on 05/21/2006 12:25:30 PM PDT by Crawdad (Hey, baby. Can I hijack your thread?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
rotflol...

i can smell a major bust for the dems in nov.

with all the hype of disaster for the pubs, one can safely predict the nov elections will be underwhelming for them at the very least.

7 posted on 05/21/2006 12:26:08 PM PDT by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Perhaps a low ebb amongst its alleged "leadership".

The bedrock rank and file seems quite healthy thank-you, this Forum being Exhibit A.


8 posted on 05/21/2006 12:27:30 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

He seems to be confusing conservatives' perceived opposition to immigration with our actual opposition to illegal immigration.
9 posted on 05/21/2006 12:28:16 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Low ebb? IN case the fool missed it, Conservatives are within one vote and a Senate Majority Leader of controlling all 3 branches of the Fed Government for the 1st time since 1932. Frist resigning and a new Congress in 2007 are the Conservatives best chance ever. Considering 7 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices were born in the 1920s, Liberals should be VERY afraid.
11 posted on 05/21/2006 12:29:20 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Conservative, The simple fact about DC is this . "There is more work to do"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Does anyone think these children will forget how their families, their mothers and fathers, were treated once they grow up to become voters, as they surely will?

If they are back in Mexico, I could care less what they think...

12 posted on 05/21/2006 12:31:57 PM PDT by Wheee The People
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Conservative crack-down in progress. Rino's and rats beware.


13 posted on 05/21/2006 12:31:59 PM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

When did rewarding criminality with welfare state entitlements become a 'conservative' value?


14 posted on 05/21/2006 12:34:48 PM PDT by AntiGuv (How is Mexico our friend?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

I guess he forgot to mention what a POS the rat party has become.


15 posted on 05/21/2006 12:37:49 PM PDT by Ed_in_NJ (Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Today's demagogues use the latest wave of immigrants to much the same effect

Um, in the 1850's, Catholics were no threat to outnumber Protestants anytime soon. Now, in Southern California alone, "white non-hispanics" will be a small minority in a generation. That is already a fact.

It is not "immigration" when 25-40% of a populous country leave that country and colonize another. It is, in fact, invasion.

And it is not immigration when hundreds of thousands of those people march in the streets of America under the flag of a foreign and hostile nation, while claiming the land and political power of America for themselves. That is sedition, treason, and an open declaration of war against the United States.

There are no "demagogues" on the Right on this issue. There is no historical precedent for anything like what is happening - a literal takeover of a country by what can only be called "immivasion". The only demagogues are those on the Left who refuse to allow any discussion of it, save to engage in name calling like "racist", or "nativist", or whatever idiot epithet they can hurl.

16 posted on 05/21/2006 12:37:51 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

and the rats dream on, da la la, and the rats dream on.....

NOTHING in this WORLD would make a rat more happier than to be back in power...


17 posted on 05/21/2006 12:42:31 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Conservatives are certainly NOT divided. However, the Republicans are divided between the true conservatives and the RINOs.
19 posted on 05/21/2006 12:44:28 PM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Of course I'm talking about the state of American conservatism in 1854, when the Whigs were crumbling fast.

If the author by conservatism means the party of big government, the party of internal improvements, national banks, the party that would destroy federalism and centralize the power in Washington DC I suppose he is correct. If by conservatism he means the party of limited government he isn't talking about the Whigs or the early Republican party

20 posted on 05/21/2006 12:45:32 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Because we only have one credible party capable of national governance right now, all substantive debate takes place within that party.


22 posted on 05/21/2006 12:50:50 PM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Conservatives are divided, dejected, and drifting, caught between anger and indecision. The political party they've made theirs is headed for setbacks in this year's congressional elections, and further defeats loom ahead.

I'm not drifting at all, nor caught between anger and indecision. The GOP is.

24 posted on 05/21/2006 12:53:44 PM PDT by Smedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
A delightful article but conservatism is at a hgh point now. We are in much the same ascendency as the liberals in the sixties. Politicial discourse is always between a conservative view and a moderate one. Liberals are at a low ebb.

And, as of now, there is no "liberal Buckley" preparing our undoing.

We may be divided between the "desperate" conservatives who think we should grab as much as possible before the tide turns, and the "method" conservatives who think we can conserve the momentum.

25 posted on 05/21/2006 12:53:50 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson