Actually, you continue to make my point for me. After a SINGLE post from you in which you actually did what you claimed you wanted to do over 700 posts ago, you run through the first paragraph of a 70 page document, and then start making claims the document doesn't even talk about (as evidenced by your lack of annotation or reference to them which you managed to do in your first few comments in your post). So in good faith, I respond to your post, point by point. Agreeing and disagreeing and using nothing by data from the document to back my positions. And after all that, your response is to comment on your fantasy and unsupported belief that the CFR document advocates absorbing Mexico as a US territory? Of course CFR doesn't have a "Constitutional option" in their document concerning Mexico. It also doesn't have an option for declaring the world flat, for dealing with visitors from Mars, or for regulating how men walk on water. None of those things are discussed in the document, and neither is your phony Mexico territory issue.
Again...you still haven't read the whole document, have you. I guess I'm glad you at least read the first page. It's a start.