And then you said they said this...
"The goals are to remove the sovereignty of the United States and of Canada, take their wealth and distribute it to Mexico, even moreso than has been the case. It is to encourage migration from Mexico to the United States."
And this...
" Encouragement of migration is plainly spelled out. Focusing on the borders of the North American Union is plainly spelled out. Reducing focus on internal borders, i.e., Canada/USA and USA/Mexico, is plainly spelled out. Encouraging interdependence and/or assimilation between and among Canada/USA and USA/Mexico is also within the texts."
Of course they say no such thing. So I asked you to reference where you found support for your statements... and you tell me to "get google, type in the words "migration", "border", "dependent", and "assimilate" and you'll find those terms." And you think THAT is "convincing"?
The fact remains, you continue to make statements you cannot support. You can post every document the CFR has ever written, but if you say they've said something they haven't said, you are no more correct than you are now.
Similarly, just as your non-denial denial that you have "no horse in this race," or that you are not "conflicted" to even be discussing this document objectively, even though your relative is in CFR and may have had a hand in designing the very document about which we speak, does not make your claims factual. Unless we believe what you say just because....well, you said so.
And neither does your claim that the "reason I didn't post I have a family member in the CFR is because that fact is ENTIRELY irrelevant to the discussion" make that fact, well, irrelevant at all. Trust me.