Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bikers4Bush
Common language is not the same as official language.

Common is weaker than official, but neither means much unless Congress explicitly defines what having an official language means. Without a definition, the executive branch has broad authority to interpret it's meaning, and it wouldn't really change anything.

Even if Congress does define it well, there's still going to be a good chance of it being undermined through judicial review in the name of preventing racism.

It needs to be a made the official language through an Amendment to the US Constitution which defines the scope of the official language as well.

51 posted on 05/19/2006 7:22:08 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: untrained skeptic

I'd be all for an amendment.


55 posted on 05/19/2006 7:25:22 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson