Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegals granted Social Security (05/18/06-Senate 50-49 vote/based on past illegal employment ????)
Washington Times ^ | May 19, 2006 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 05/19/2006 5:13:02 AM PDT by IrishMike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last
To: IrishMike

Term limits and/or mandatory retirement age. It's obvious that some (actually, a lot) of our politicians in both parties are senile. Some of them can barely walk and talk. It's time for a clean sweep, especially in the Senate.


41 posted on 05/19/2006 5:46:36 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

...."
No more new participants - let this monsterous, socialist ponzi scheme die from lack of new suckers"....


True but impossible.
The purse strings are the power in DC.


42 posted on 05/19/2006 5:49:44 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Let's see, Americans do not qualify unless they have worked and paid into SS for 40 quarters, but illegal aliens receive these benefits after 8. Nice.

Guess we will have to change our names to Jose and learn mexican, then we get free health care and retirement.

43 posted on 05/19/2006 5:49:53 AM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
"It just boggles the mind how people could be against this amendment."

This phrase has become way overused. Altho it's true. There do seem to be many boggled minds in Wash D.C. Must be those 3 martini lunches. Time to kick the bums out!

44 posted on 05/19/2006 5:50:41 AM PDT by uncitizen (" We are a nation of NATIVES")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Just collecting the Social Security that Americans won't collect...


45 posted on 05/19/2006 5:50:48 AM PDT by P-40 (Support Apartheid in Mexico! Hire an illegal today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMM48
Term limits and/or mandatory retirement age.

I'm for a no confidence vote? Apparently these new voters coming on-line have more clout than existing citizens.

46 posted on 05/19/2006 5:51:17 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

'need to post the roll call'

exactly. would love to know who voted FOR allowing ILLEGAL immigrants to receive SS benefits. Also, anyone know if this was passed by the House? This is truly unbelievable. Congress needs to hear from LEGAL citizens.


47 posted on 05/19/2006 5:51:28 AM PDT by 4integrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
You can go to any foreign embassy not on US soil and turn in your Passport and renounce your citizenship. Then I guess you'd just have to stroll across our southern border and Viola! You're in!

You left out the part of calling yourself Jose and saying see, and no a lot.

48 posted on 05/19/2006 5:53:00 AM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Isn't Social Security already bankrupt as it is?


49 posted on 05/19/2006 5:53:52 AM PDT by uncitizen (" We are a nation of NATIVES")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
- If they are here illegaly, they have no valid SS number.

They can use a bogus number, i.e., someone else's, or apply for one with phony documents. In either case, they are perpetrating a fraud and probably committing perjury, which is a felony offense. The SS application process for a card states:

We need ORIGINAL documents or copies certified by the custodian of the record. We will return your documents after we have seen them. We cannot accept photocopies or notarized copies of documents.

ORIGINAL CARD: To apply for an original card, you will need to provide at least two documents to prove age, identity, and U.S. citizenship or current lawful, work-authorized immigration status. If you are not a U.S. citizen or do not have current lawful, work-authorized immigration status, you MUST prove that you have a valid nonwork reason for requesting a card.

REPLACEMENT CARD: To apply for a replacement card, you must prove your identity. If you were born outside of the U.S., you will also need to prove your U.S. citizenship or current lawful,work-authorized immigration status. If you need to correct information on your SSN card, or information shown in our records (e.g., a namechange, or corrected date of birth), you will need to prove your identity and provide documents that support the change and establish the reason for the change (e.g., a birth certificate to show your corrected date or place of birth). If you were born outside of the U.S., you also need to prove your U.S.citizenship or current lawful, work-authorized immigration status.

LIMITS ON REPLACEMENT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER (SSN) CARDS Public Law 108-458 imposes limits on the number of replacement SSN cards you may receive at 3 per year and 10 in a lifetime. In determining these limits, SSA will not count changes in name (i.e., first nameor surname), or changes to a restrictive legend (i.e., Valid for Work with DHS Authorization, Not Valid forEmployment) shown on the SSN card. In addition, we may grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis ifyou provide evidence to establish a need for an SSN card beyond these limits (e.g., a letter from a socialservices agency stating you must show the SSN card in order to get benefits).

8.B. You must show the mother's Social Security number only when the application is for an original Social Security card for a person under age 18. However, this item may be left blank if the mother was never assigned a Social Security number, or if you do not know the mother's Social Security number and are unable to obtain it. We will still be able to assign a number to the person underage

You must show the father's Social Security number only when the application is for an original Social Security card for a person under age 18. However, this item may be left blank if the father was never assigned a Social Security number, or if you do not know the father's Social Securitynumber and are unable to obtain it.

CITIZENSHIP: Generally, we can accept most documents that show you were born in the U.S. If you are a U.S. citizen born outside the U.S., show us a U.S. Consular Report of Birth, a U.S. passport, a Certificate of Citizenship, or a Certificate of Naturalization.

IMMIGRATION STATUS: We need to see a current document issued to you by the Department ofHomeland Security (DHS) showing your immigration status, such as Form I-551, I-94, I-688B, orI-766. We CANNOT accept a receipt showing you applied for the document. If you are not authorized to work in the U.S., we can issue you a Social Security card only if you need the number for a valid nonwork reason. Your card will be marked to show you cannot work. If you do work, we will notify DHS.

EVIDENCE DOCUMENTS WE NEED TO SEE The following lists are not all inclusive. However, they provide examples of the types of documents we need to see. AGE: We prefer to see your birth certificate. However, we can accept another document that shows your age. Some of the other documents we can accept are:• Hospital record of your birth (created at the time of your birth)• Religious record established before age five showing your age or date of birth• Passport• Final Adoption Decree (the adoption decree must indicate that the birth data was taken from theoriginal birth certificate)Call us for advice if you cannot obtain one of these documents.• Driver's license• U.S. Immigration Document• Life insurance policy• Court-ordered Name Change• Final Adoption Decree (only if not used to establish age of the applicant)• Marriage/Divorce records• Military ID card• Passport• Employee ID card• U.S. State ID card• Foreign ID card IDENTITY: We must see evidence of identity in the name you want shown on the SSN card.

PAPERWORK/PRIVACY ACT AND YOUR APPLICATION The Privacy Act of 1974 requires us to give each person the following notice when applying for a Social Security number. Sections 205(c) and 702 of the Social Security Act allow us to collect the facts we ask for on this form. We use the facts you provide on this form to assign you a Social Security number and to issue you a Social Security card. You do not have to give us these facts, however, without them we cannot issue you a Social Security number or a card. Without a number, you may not be able to get a job and could lose Social Security benefits in the future.

The Social Security number is also used by the Internal Revenue Service for tax administration purposes as an identifier in processing tax returns of persons who have income which is reported tothe Internal Revenue Service and by persons who are claimed as dependents on someone's Federal income tax return. We may disclose information as necessary to administer Social Security programs, including to appropriate law enforcement agencies to investigate alleged violations of Social Security law; to other government agencies for administering entitlement, health, and welfare programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, veterans benefits, military pension, and civil service annuities, black lung,housing, student loans, railroad retirement benefits, and food stamps; to the Internal Revenue Service for Federal tax administration; and to employers and former employers to properly prepare wage reports. We may also disclose information as required by Federal law, for example, to the Department of Homeland Security, to identify and locate aliens in the U.S.; to the Selective ServiceSystem for draft registration; and to the Department of Health and Human Services for child support enforcement purposes.

We may verify Social Security numbers for State motor vehicle agencies that use the number in issuing drivers licenses, as authorized by the Social Security Act. Finally, wem ay disclose information to your Congressional representative if they request information to answer questions you ask him or her.We may use the information you give us when we match records by computer. Matching programs compare our records with those of other Federal, State, or local government agencies to determine whether a person qualifies for benefits paid by the Federal government. The law allows us to do this even if you do not agree to it.

50 posted on 05/19/2006 5:55:03 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
I got a much better idea. Let's pay illegals Social Security but ONLY IF IT COMES SOLELY FROM THE CONGRESSIONAL PENSION FUND subtracted from what our overpaid in retirement tyrants receive after they leave office. It wasn't Congresses money to give them the thieving tyrants. Most illegals never paid one red cent into the Social Security fund.

How much more can our congress do for them, how much more will congress and POTUS give away that which is ours before the OH My Beloved GOP shills finally get angry enough to discipline this party of tyrants? Better yet give me one good reason why the GOP as it stands today should not be replaced by a more Constitutionally Conservative one? Don't tell me it can't be done. GOP history proves it can indeed be done. Go ahead Party Bots help them sell us out. But count me out of any support for such as these.

Anyone voting for ones such as these for any reason including party are only part of the problem. The only peaceful solution now is revolt at the polls. Don't preach to me on the DEMs. Party Bots have helped make them the problem 100 fold what they once were by moving the GOP further left each election so the Dems don't get elected nonsense. This is the result of your lesser of two evils can't you open your eyes and see it? WAKE UP REPUBLICANS!

51 posted on 05/19/2006 5:58:11 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Realism
Suddenly I get the feeling that this NEW improved immigration policy is going to be nothing but another legislative farce. Legislative farce IS the U.S. Congress.
52 posted on 05/19/2006 5:58:29 AM PDT by riskybiz ($$$$ and votes is the coinage of Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 4integrity

I don't think there is a roll call record. That's why it passed. If they'd been required to go on record, it would have failed in lopsided fashion. On the other hand, this shows what is really in the hearts of our Senators. They are trying to cause damage to the average American.

I just wrote a nasty email to my Senator, and I encourage everyone else to do the same.

Much more must be made about this. This immigration issue is really about social security and medicare. These people are not going to pay anywhere near what it will cost to provide social security and medicare benefits to them, if we make them legal.


53 posted on 05/19/2006 5:58:55 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Grouped By Vote Position

YEAs ---50
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Clinton (D-NY)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (R-SC)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Specter (R-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Stevens (R-AK)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Wyden (D-OR)

And the rest who voted against it...

NAYs ---49
Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Allen (R-VA) Bennett (R-UT) Bond (R-MO) Bunning (R-KY) Burns (R-MT) Burr (R-NC) Byrd (D-WV) Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Coleman (R-MN) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Cornyn (R-TX) Craig (R-ID) Crapo (R-ID) Dayton (D-MN) DeMint (R-SC) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Frist (R-TN) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Isakson (R-GA) Kyl (R-AZ) Lott (R-MS) McConnell (R-KY) Murkowski (R-AK) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Roberts (R-KS) Santorum (R-PA) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-OR) Snowe (R-ME) Sununu (R-NH) Talent (R-MO) Thomas (R-WY) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Warner (R-VA)

plus Rockefeller (D-WV), who didn't vote!
54 posted on 05/19/2006 6:02:11 AM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

"Isn't Social Security already bankrupt as it is?"

From what I understand there is no "account" that SS is specifically earmarked to be deposited it. It supposedly goes into a "general slush fund".......currently paying out more than it takes in.


55 posted on 05/19/2006 6:03:26 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

I'm 51 and I would take a lump sum payment of my Social Security Banefits and run.

This Senate vote is outrageous. Illegal aliens have more rights now than citizens.


56 posted on 05/19/2006 6:08:31 AM PDT by texasmountainman (Remember the heroic men and women of Flight 93-go watch United 93.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; ...

PING!

As the nation slides further towards bankruptcy...

(This time, it's the RIGHT thread...)


57 posted on 05/19/2006 6:09:33 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (One flag--American. One language--English. One allegiance--to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen
Isn't Social Security already bankrupt as it is?

Only when it fits the congresscritters agenda of the moment.

58 posted on 05/19/2006 6:10:52 AM PDT by riskybiz ($$$$ and votes is the coinage of Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Un-Freaking-Believable is right. Note this gem:

Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat, said it would be unfair to deny illegals the benefits. "We should not steal their funds or empty their Social Security accounts," he said. "That is not fair. It does not reward their hard work or their financial contributions. It violates the trust that underlies the Social Security Trust Fund."

That's right, folks. We the American taxpayer should not "steal" from them. That would be "unfair." We are truly living in the Twilight Zone.

59 posted on 05/19/2006 6:10:55 AM PDT by workerbee (Democrats are a waste of tax money and good oxygen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: harpu

All the usual suspects: Chafee (R-RI); Graham (R-SC); Hagel (R-NE); Lugar (R-IN); Martinez (R-FL); McCain (R-AZ); Specter (R-PA); and Stevens (R-AK).




60 posted on 05/19/2006 6:12:47 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson