To: Admin Moderator
Nobody has been banned. Actually, all they received was a polite warning to knock it off. Please get your facts straight before accusing next time. Thank you. It does seem more reasonable to give a poster a "warning" before they are "banned." Although I've seen bannings happen without a warning.
I've had news threads which, even when I designate as Extended News, are removed from any sidebar category, yet a vanity rant is "Breaking News."
I am not following the logic here. And I am still wondering why a poster who made a death threat on forum was not banned.
703 posted on
05/17/2006 10:32:19 AM PDT by
La Enchiladita
(God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
To: La Enchiladita; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson
And I am still wondering why a poster who made a death threat on forum was not banned. You aren't the only one who wonders why he is still posting.
989 posted on
05/17/2006 11:31:08 AM PDT by
LucyT
("Whether it's the best of times or the worst of times, it's the only time we've got"... Art Buchwald)
To: La Enchiladita
"yet a vanity rant is "Breaking News."
If the info about the fake Bush doc's was posted to the Friday Silliness thread, then that thread (Friday Silliness) understandably becomes breaking news.
Sometimes the breaking news is in a reply, not in the original story.
1,039 posted on
05/17/2006 11:39:29 AM PDT by
jdm
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson