Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

yeah but a Harrier on a deck that size does really seem like a waste of time and space......

Unless, of course, this is a precursor to NATO jumping into the JSF with both feet.....


82 posted on 05/16/2006 3:38:26 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - Woohoo!! I'm on A List!!! yay!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: MikefromOhio
yeah but a Harrier on a deck that size does really seem like a waste of time and space......

The new UK carriers were going to be the size of the Nimitz class carriers, much bigger than what they have now.

The Brits are probably not going to build the twi larger aircraft carriers anyway. They are having problems with guns and butter. The JFK would be a good interim solution and be available immediately.

87 posted on 05/16/2006 3:45:34 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: MikefromOhio
He did not elaborate on more details, but noted that the aircraft carrier hosts helicopter and vertical-lift aircraft.

We are flying Harriers off the JFK now. Probably part of a Marine Aircraft Wing.

95 posted on 05/16/2006 3:48:09 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson