Posted on 05/16/2006 9:24:55 AM PDT by Paul Ross
Corruption is the fruit of their Bolshevik revolution, just as it is everywhere else the commies ran for a while...
Sorry bud, facts and reality matter - The reality is federal spending today as a % of the economy is lower then the past 30 year average! - Furthermore non-security related discretionary spending has been cut for 5 years straight! (that doesn't mean the Gov't doesn't spend too much on all levels...federal, State and local...but the reality is, it isn't what you are suggesting in relation to GWB).
No Child Left Behind was nothing more then the reality of the demographics of this Country and what the public was demanding (accountability of the public education system).
Medicare Drug Bill? I don't particularly like it (however GWB is pushing for overhauls in private medical accounts which will pay off in the long run) - But if the criteria is 100% approval of all policy decisions while in office... in order to be a true Conservative...then we have had NONE in our history.
I agree, here's all i need to know. Ted Kennedy and Dick Durbin agree with the President. Nuf said
DEAR MR. PRESIDENT:
Three point plan to genuinely please your GOP base:
1) Enforce employer sanctions beginning this week. Really enforce them. Be serious, and effective. We know you can be.
2) Secure the border. That's going to take at least ten times as many guards as you've mentioned. PLEASE HIRE THEM. If we can rebuild a demolished violent country on the other side of the planet after 30 years of a terrorist ruler, we can certainly hire 50,000 more border guards, to preserve safety and freedom right here in the U. S. of A.
3) Then (and only then) discuss guest workers.
Any other order, will not work.
Other than that, keep up the good job.
But if you get this one wrong - none of the rest will matter, because Dems are going to make it impossible. We can all see that. Only you can stop it.
Please fix this. For your supporters. For our country.
God bless America.
Ouch, I sprained my eyeballs just reading that. What tiny percentage of the budget are you talking about?
Shrug it off all you want...but the reality is most entitlement spending requirements were placed on this WH long before they came into office (and the process for reversing those costs takes decades...not years). Which GWB is trying to do for example with private accounts for Soc Sec (though he needs more conservatives elected in the Senate) and with private medical accounts -
Secondly, it is the one area this President can cut without jumping through years of hoops...and he has done just that...cut spending in this area.
Lastly, on the whole federal spending today is lower then the past 30 year average. You don't have to like it, but facts matter and people trying to suggest GWB is spending like no other are simply not being accurate in relation to the growth of this country on the whole.
How is it compared to the Clinton years? You don't sell used cars for your day job do you?
Just keep posting facts, even though there are those here who refuse to accept reality.
Whoops...Michael Reagan....another darned troll out to bash Bush.
Who will be left standing sides Kristol and Barnes?
I feel abandoned a bit here too i might add.
I know everyone is really tore up over that..lol
He's not running again and seems to be thinking of a legacy. Why that includes capitulating to Dems. and making nicey-nice I don't know.
I do know that he should indeed listen to his base.
Any President who doesn't use the veto won't be remembered as great. Any President who defends himself on any issue by first mentioning how much of our money he has spent on the issue won't be remembered as great. Any President whose followers claim he can't push the big ideas through Congress because he is a helpless kitten (even though his party has held both chambers most of the time) won't be remembered as great or even good.
Well, we're going to find out.
I hope you're right, and the Republicans don't crater in November, but I doubt that even Reagan himself could have sold this plan in the present climate. At this point, it's about politics, not policy. And if you don't think a critical fraction of Republicans are perfectly capable of staying home on election day in a snit, well, you haven't walked enough Republican precincts yet.
Marking.
There is no constitutional basis for any federal intrusion into the area of education. That clearly was a matter intended to be left to the several states. The concept that the Federal Gov. would ever have the power to confiscate taxes from our livelihoods and personal labors and blackmail our states with that money was not contemplated by the founders and if it had been would have been expressly rejected. Having some experience with this Kennedy education bill, my opinion is not only does it violate the constitution regarding limitations on federal powers, it is a crock that has severely burdened the costs of the educations systems of the states and is in fact not accomplishing squat in terms of substantial increases in scholastic abilities of the vast majority of our children. Big debates here but if Bush's legacy is going to be measured by this "accomplishment" the verdict is not yet in and clearly no claim of victory is close to being justified.
But if the criteria is 100% approval of all policy decisions while in office... in order to be a true Conservative...then we have had NONE in our history.
Not the right criteria. Even a broken clock is right twice a day (broken sundial may never be right so I guess he does not belong in that camp but I had to think about it...just kidding but barely)..It is clear on illegal immigration, Bush has steadfastly refused to enforce the law much less try to reverse the ever increasing flow of Mexicans illegally infiltrating our country. He has been on the amnesty kick the whole time the border has been being overrun.The real question is why, I have my own suspicions but we should really examine why he has not been as effective as Clintoon (ugh) "was-was" at this. Maybe we should follow the money?
The problem is here you refuse to be either intellectually honest or to give any understanding that good people can come to differing conclusions on how best to solve this 40 year in the making problem - The question I have is why?...though I have my suspicious.
The notion that GWB has steadfastly refused to follow the law is silly - The reality is close to 6 million people have been turned back from our borders in the last 5 years alone (though tremendous efforts) - The notion that our borders are wide open, is completely false as well - The notion that all 12 million illegals have come across the border illegally is false, as a sizable portion of those here illegally now came under worker permits and then never went back (wrongly so....but securing the border has nothing to do with this equation of the problem).
Secondly you completely spin the notion that GWB is for amnesty. When he is not (why must you lie?). Amnesty is what R. Reagan gave in 1986...one minute millions of illegals were illegal...the next minute they were not....with absolutely no requirements.
That is not what GWB is proposing. He is speaking of background checks, mechanisms for assimilation requirements (English, etc)....The reality is we have a temporary workers program that needs to be reformed. We must who is in this country, be able to verify they are still here or not, and locate them if needed. GWB plan does exactly this (and it is sorely needed just as much as our border security is).
The reality is GWB is taking a serious and commonsense look at addressing the current problems with both legal and illegal immigration in this Country. Hopefully the House can do a little of its own tweaking and we have a full and comprehensive reform packaged passed.
I agree Mm62, it is sad that he seems intent on going out this way. GWB has been listening to his critics more than the people who elected him it seems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.