[neodad]

I've been trying to decide which is worse... A rat senate (not too bad, we already have one), a rat house (worse because tax policy originates there, as do articles of impeachment), or a rat president. I think if we can keep the house, who cares about the senate?

[varon]

.................or a rat president. I think if we can keep the house, who cares about the senate?

If we keep the house, is it possiblistic to ride the rat president out of town on a rail?

[Huck]

In a Dem controlled Senate, with Dem committee majorities, do any conservative judges even make it out of committee? Not during these moonbat times.

[LS]

Ever hear of judges? You do NOT want a Rat senate, regardless of what you think of the current crop and/or Bush.

This really isn't an option.

[votelife]

the problem with losing the Senate is that they confirm Bush's judges...and forget about any tax legislation passing, instead look forward to Kennedy and Hillary as committee chairs.