Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr

Did I not mention at some point that I believe that we'll have better border security in the long run by not building a wall, by not deporting millions of Mexicans, by doing all we can to support a stable Mexican government, by not doing things that will increase the likelihood of a Marxist regime on our border. I thought I said or suggested at least a few of these, but I suppose I did so in other posts.

If "conservative" implies "taking draconian measures," then Bush isn't one. But I don't think that's what it means, and that was what my analogy was trying to point out--we view the word "conservative" differently and in my opinion, Bush's position is more conservative in the long run, more likely to conserve freedom.


227 posted on 05/16/2006 4:27:35 PM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: zook
If "conservative" implies "taking draconian measures," then Bush isn't one.

one more time, sloooowly --

I didn't say anything about "draconian measures". Straw man, yet again.

I said, "smaller govt and securing the border".

You, again, failed to mention, comment on, respond to, or in any way refer to what I'm saying.

You're having a conversation with yourself.

237 posted on 05/17/2006 6:30:55 AM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson