Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doohickey

What is the matter with having real fences? We built a 23 mile long fence below San Diego on the border. It has worked. A virtual fence stops no one. It just alerts the BP that people are coming in. The BP agents must then apprehend the people coming in. They must be detained and processed legally. That takes time and money. If they can't get in here in the first place, you don't need detention centers, judges, or exposing BP agents to possible injury in the apprehension process.

We have a virtual fence because it can be taken down much easier and faster. How gullible do these politics think we are? If we don't build more physical barriers, we are really not serious about border security.


310 posted on 05/15/2006 5:06:44 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

virtual fence=virtual reality


338 posted on 05/15/2006 5:08:15 PM PDT by Optimist (I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

"What is the matter with having real fences? We built a 23 mile long fence below San Diego on the border. It has worked. A virtual fence stops no one. It just alerts the BP that people are coming in. The BP agents must then apprehend the people coming in. They must be detained and processed legally. That takes time and money. If they can't get in here in the first place, you don't need detention centers, judges, or exposing BP agents to possible injury in the apprehension process."

Good points. You should post and repost them.


350 posted on 05/15/2006 5:08:50 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson