Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/09/2006 5:18:23 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: neverdem

Meow!!!


2 posted on 05/09/2006 5:20:49 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I'm thinking that the poor performance in the WOD is partly due to poor border control. It could easily be that the drug flow "funds" the blind eye to the people flow.


4 posted on 05/09/2006 5:24:01 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
It appears to me like Mr.Tierney has a habit or two that he'd like to legitimize.
5 posted on 05/09/2006 5:24:03 PM PDT by appleharvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I smell a DemonRat.


6 posted on 05/09/2006 5:27:02 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth to a Liberal, is like a crucifix to a vampire))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The 25 year term that Richard Paey got is a travesty. Richard Paey was not a drug dealer, and he has a morphine drip for his pain in prison. There are murderers who don't come close to serving a 25 year sentence.


7 posted on 05/09/2006 5:29:56 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

What a waste of newsprint.


8 posted on 05/09/2006 5:31:52 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
" Paey offered a simple explanation: “The wealthy and influential go to rehab, while the poor and powerless go to prison.”

There are a lot of FREE drug rehab programs. They advertise them on my radio every day.

Why didn't Paey choose to go to one?

9 posted on 05/09/2006 5:32:09 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

October 24, 2005, 8:37 a.m.
Sick
A Florida paraplegic needs relief.

By Radley Balko

Today, Richard Paey sits in a wheelchair behind high walls and razor wire in a high-security prison near Daytona Beach. Paey is a 46-year-old father of three, and a paraplegic. His condition is the result of a car accident, a botched back surgery, and a case of multiple sclerosis — three setbacks that have left him in a chronic, debilitating state of pain. After moving to Florida from New Jersey, Paey found it increasingly difficult to get prescriptions for the pain medication he needed to function normally — to support his family, and to be a parent to his children.




Paey's difficulties finding treatment were in large part due to federal- and state-government efforts to prevent the illegal use — or "diversion," as the feds call it — of prescription pain medicine. Doctors today face fines ,suspension, the loss of license or practice, the seizure of property, or even prison time in the event that drug cops (most of whom have no medical training) decide they are prescribing too many painkillers. As a result, physicians are understandably apprehensive about aggressively treating pain.

Like many pain patients, Paey found himself on the blunt end of such policies. He went from doctor to doctor, looking for someone to give him the medication he needed. By the time he eventually turned to his old New Jersey doctor for help, he had already attracted the attention of Florida drug-control authorities. What happened next is disputed, but it ended with Paey getting arrested, getting his home raided, and eventually getting convicted of drug distribution.

Paey insists his old doctor wrote him the prescriptions he needed. The Florida pharmacists who testified at his trial back him up. But the doctor says he forged the prescriptions. For his part, Paey holds no animus against his former doctor. Cops gave the doctor a devil's bargain — give Paey up, or face 25-years-to-life imprisonment for the excessive proscribing of painkillers. Paey still maintains the prescriptions were legitimate, but understands why his doctor turned against him.

The larger issue, of course, is why a man who is clearly not an addict (he wasn't taking the medication to get high) and had a legitimate use for the medication wasn't given access to what he needed in the first place.

State prosecutors concede there's no evidence Paey ever sold or gave his medication away. Nevertheless, under draconian drug-war statutes, these prosecutors could pursue distribution charges against him based solely on the amount of medication he possessed (the unauthorized possession of as few as 60 tablets of some pain medications can qualify a person as a "drug trafficker").

After three trials, Richard Paey was convicted and put in prison for 25 years, effectively a life sentence for someone in his condition. Ironically, the state of Florida now pays for a morphine pump connected to Paey's spine which delivers the same class of medication at the same doses the state of Florida told him wasn't necessary, and put him in prison for trying to obtain.

Prosecutors originally offered Paey a plea bargain that would have helped him avoid jail time, but Paey refused, insisting that (a) he did nothing wrong, and (b) even if he had, it shouldn't be a crime to seek relief from chronic pain. Paey feared that a plea would make other doctors in the state more reluctant to treat pain than they already were.

Publicly, Paey's prosecutors have conceded that the 25-year sentence was excessive, yet they insist that Paey himself is to blame, citing his refusal to accept a plea agreement. The chilling implication: Paey is serving prison time for drug distribution not because he's guilty of actually distributing drugs — the state admits as much — but because he insisted on exercising his constitutionally-protected right to a jury trial.

Earlier this year, New York Times columnist John Tierney flew to Florida to interview Paey for a story that ran on July 19. Tierney's column was sympathetic to Paey's plight, and sharply critical of the state of Florida.

There is now strong evidence that the state of Florida and prison officials retaliated against Paey for speaking with Tierney. Two weeks after the interview, Paey was moved to a prison facility more than two hours from his wife and family. He was then moved even farther away, some 170 miles, to the Tomoka Correctional Institution near Daytona Beach. Sympathetic prison officials, other inmates, and medical staff have since told Paey he was moved away from his family because the guard who sat in on his interview with Tierney had complained to prison authorities about what Paey had revealed to the journalist.

At about the same time, prison medical staff told Paey that the state of Florida had refused to give permission for them to refill his morphine pump. For Paey, this information was the equivalent of a death sentence. The state of Florida left him to agonize for weeks before finally authorizing the refill, the day before his pump was scheduled to run dry. Here again, Paey has since been given strong reason to believe that the threat to withhold his medication was in retaliation for relaying his story to the New York Times.

Two activist groups representing pain patients — the Pain Relief Network and the November Coalition — have begun a campaign urging Governor Jeb Bush to grant Richard Paey a pardon. Governor Bush should hear them out. Richard Paey is not a criminal. He isn't a threat to anyone. He's a tragic figure who has become a political prisoner of America's allegiance to zero-tolerance drug prohibition.

The Paey case has already cast a good deal of shame on the state of Florida. Just how much more shame his story brings to the state depends on whether political leaders move to rectify his plight, or rather choose simply to ignore him, and continue to intimidate him into spending the rest of his 25-year prison term in silence.

Governor Bush should free Richard Paey. And Florida lawmakers should pass reforms to ensure that drug-war fanaticism no longer prevents sick people from getting the medication they need.

— Radley Balko is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.


* * *

As an Aussie, I had never heard of Richard Paey. Found this on Google...what a tragic tale this is. There's got to be something rotten in Florida IMO.


12 posted on 05/09/2006 5:35:44 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Read the bio THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free! Click Fred Nerks for link to my Page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"Also like Limbaugh, he was accused of illegally obtaining large quantities of painkillers. "

Rush was accused of that, but when it came down to nut cuttin' time, the large quantity was only 40.

15 posted on 05/09/2006 5:41:11 PM PDT by auggy ( http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/THISWILLMAKEYOUPROUD.HTML)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
the drug war supported by Limbaugh and his fellow conservatives

This is a cheap canard. Conservatives are just as likely to find the war on drugs a self-defeating farce as liberals are, and the converse is also true. There are plenty of left wing democrats who are all-out drug warriors.

19 posted on 05/09/2006 5:47:00 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Yeah, but what has this Paey guy ever done about the
BORDERS???

< \THREAD HIJACK>

21 posted on 05/09/2006 5:53:01 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Limbaugh objected when prosecutors, unable to come up with enough evidence against him, demanded to be allowed to go through his medical records in the hope of finding something. He managed to stop them in court, but other defendants can’t afford long legal battles to protect their privacy.

Actually, I think the prosecutors did get to see Limbaugh's medical records. If there was anything in them that they could have used against Rush, I believe they would have.

26 posted on 05/09/2006 6:06:56 PM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This guy seems to have a problem with Rush skating. I wonder how he feels about Patches.


30 posted on 05/09/2006 6:17:48 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
And?

If there were a case against Rush Limbaugh the prosecutor would not have agreed to the "plea".

Case closed.

Get a life, Mr. Tierney.

31 posted on 05/09/2006 6:22:07 PM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This post is pretty lame, which is it ,Limbaugh or the drug cops you after or will any ole' conservative do.


32 posted on 05/09/2006 6:48:27 PM PDT by lonedawg (why does that rag on your head say holiday inn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The wealth and the powerful hired big shot legal talent and spend millions to fight the system. It has NOTHING to do with anything other then the basic corruption of our legal system. Justice may be blind, she is also a hooker available to the buyer who can meet her price.


34 posted on 05/09/2006 7:11:36 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Third Party Freepers: Rebels without a clue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The sentence this guy got handed to him is insane! Unless there is more that's unknown here, be basically got sent to prison for 25 years for trying to get his pain relieved. Unless it's a pain clinic, doctors almost never prescribe anywhere near enough medicine to help a patient deal with such things, I know this from experience. Sometimes it seems they are more concerned with liability issues than helping people who really need it.

Justice wasn't served in this case. No one was harmed. This guy may have violated some man made laws, but I don't see how he can go to prison longer than most child molesters and many murderers.


36 posted on 05/09/2006 7:36:31 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

WOD insanity ping.


37 posted on 05/09/2006 7:38:18 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Wow, a border hijack attempt and Terri Schivao hijack attempt all in the same thread.
40 posted on 05/09/2006 8:05:07 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Did you ever consider, Mr. Tierney, that Rush is innocent, as his "not guilty" plea would suggest?

Of course you didn't, you slimy scumsucking commie @$$hole.


44 posted on 05/09/2006 8:31:53 PM PDT by Zman516 ("Allah" is Satan, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson