Posted on 05/09/2006 7:50:33 AM PDT by Incorrigible
I often hear from readers who wonder why I so thoroughly dislike George W. Bush.
It's simple. Living in New Jersey, as I do, I spend a lot of time arguing politics with liberals. In the pre-Bush era, I found it easy to win such arguments. I have fond memories of defending the policies of Ronald Reagan back in the good old days. "He called the Soviet Union an evil empire!" the liberal would say.
"But it is an evil empire," I would point out...
...Before George W. came along, conservatives were on the winning side of every major issue. We were the ones who disdained the Beltway class, who pushed for smaller, more responsible government. Remember term limits? The balanced-budget amendment? In the Clinton era, the GOP promised such reforms...
...But to call Bush a traitor to his political philosophy is to imply that he had one. He didn't. You can read through Bush's various speeches over the years without coming up with the slightest hint of a coherent system of thought. In this, he's the opposite of Reagan...
...That's George W. to a T, an entertainer past his prime. Only his fellow entertainers -- Rush Limbaugh et al. -- still pretend he knows what he's doing...
As I am fond of reminding readers, I was onto this fraud from the first. In November of 1999 I urged that he drop out of the GOP primary. In the spring of 2004, I suggested that renominating him would lead to disaster for the party. The only good I can see coming out of this mess is that it opens a whole new line of argument against the liberals: After Bush, no president will ever be trusted again.
(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...
Yes but it makes for great, outlandish debates! Especially with in-laws at family events!
Commies and RINOS and RATS, OH MY! Commies and RINOS and RATS, OH MY!
"John Farmer of course is a bucket carrier. Heck, he even built the bucket!"
I could have swore I read somewhere that Farmer worked for the DNC or a Dem candidate in some capacity. I wrote to Farmer asking him and he never responded.
I would like to find out more so I can write an Op-Ed piece about DNC bucket carriers and how we should take what they write with a grain of salt.
And he had SIX years to close it.
Hey, I happen to LIKE Beau and Jeff Bridges!
Blah blah blah. Can't be criticizing Bush now, can we?
NOW BACK TO REALITY!
The reality is, Bush's latest drop in the polls is due directly to his stance on a guest worker program, as detailed by Byron York in his latest NRO column.
Let's get some more conservatives up to Congress and at the State level. You want choices other than MOONBAT or RINO? You have to start with the Dogcatcher and the School Board. The choices will be there if we only vote for the BEST person in EVERY election. Losing control of Congress helps the cause how? Let's work to add seats in the House and Senate. If you don't like your respective representative get a real challenge up for his next primary, but make sure he keeps the seat for now. How does a Rat in charge of any part of government further our Conservative goals?
Nice pep rally.
Now let's look at real reality - not yours, but that of the polls. Bush is not up for re-election ever again. But the pubbies in the House are - and they are holding the line on illegal immigration and border security, while Bush meets with Dem Senators to try and get around them. But Bush's stance on a guest worker program is sandbagging the GOP.
So who is jeopardizing GOP gains here? Us critics of Bush over his guest worker proposal? Or Bush himself in his bullheaded determination to keep pushing for such?
IMO, if you really mean what you just said about holding on to Republican gains, you would immediately write a letter to the White House telling Bush to back off his guest worker proposal.
LOL
And he had SIX years to close it.
I expect the Dems to neglect border security. I don't expect a GOP president to do the same. If anything, border security and employer enforcement against hiring illegals has gotten worse under Bush.
I think your starting to get the picture Igor.........
Clicking on the link I see!
Bummer I can't bring the whole article over from the (red)Star Ledger.
I guess with Gore or Kerry as prez, Hussein and the Taliban wouldn't be in power, Gaddhafy would still have ceased his wmd production, we'd still have tax cuts, and the Supreme Court and other federal judicial nominees would still be conservative. Rather than complain about legitimate gripes about what Bush has done, these "conservative" Bush-haters dismiss everything positive he's done.
Poorly said, no thanks at all.
LOL!
Excellent parody of the typical, kneejerk know-nothings who were posting a few weeks ago during the fabricated-from-whole-cloth "ports scandal". Har! Good one.
And then 9/11 happened and we realized that Islamofascists wanted to come into our country and kill us by the thousands.
Yet the border remained open.
Rep. Steve King (R-IA) recently made a statement that illegal aliens are responsible for the deaths of 25 Americans every day - EVERY DAY! - as well as sexual crimes against 8 American children EVERY DAY. That adds up to over 8,000 Americans killed by illegal aliens EVERY YEAR and 3,000 American children having their innocence stolen. That comes to over 40,000 dead Americans and 15,000 damaged American children since President Bush took office.
Yes, the problem existed before President Bush took office. It has only grown worse while he's been in office and, just ask any Border Patrol agent, he's made the problem worse with all of his talk of amnesty and rewards for the border intruders.
The actual statistics from DHS/ICE which prove that President Bush has actually been worse at enforcing our borders and immigration laws than even Bill Clinton. Much worse. In fact, even in Clinton's worse year he had more worksite enforcements under his administration than during the ENTIRE Bush administration.
Deportable Aliens located in non-border sectors (interior enforcement):
Clinton presidency, last four years:
1997 44,246
1998 39,096
1999 42,010
2000 32,759
Total: 158,111 Bush presidency, first four years:
2001 30,496
2002 25,501
2003 26,492
2004 21,113
Total: 103,602 Total deportable aliens located in interior sectors during the first four years of the Bush presidency represents a 34.4 percent drop compared to the previous four years - the last four years of the Clinton presidency.
Deportable Aliens Located:
Clinton Presidency first four years:
1993 1,327,261
1994 1,094,719
1995 1,394,554
1996 1,649,986
Total: 5,466,520
Clinton Presidency last four years:
1997 1,536,520
1998 1,679,439
1999 1,714,035
2000 1,814,729
Total: 6,744,723
Bush Presidency first four years:
2001 1,387,486
2002 1,062,279
2003 1,046,422
2004 1,241,089
Total: 4,737,276 Total deportable aliens located dropped by 29.7 percent in the first four years of the Bush Presidency compared to the previous four years - the last four years of the Clinton Presidency.
Not only has President Bush made the problem worse with all of his talk of amnesty and rewards enticing more and more invaders to come across to get in on the freebies before the window closes, but his administration's enforcement of the border can only be called malfeasant.
Given that it is Congress that approves appropriations, pretty amazing that the Republicans in Congress have made no effort to control spending.
My pleasure. There are legitimate criticisms of Bush, but most of those who do so should remember what Bush as done with the war on terror.
I wanted to pile on like all the Bushbots. It was all I could come up with.
;-)
For some inexplicable reason, GWB has refused to wield the executive's most powerful tool in determining the budgets: The Presidential Veto. For decades that's how presidents have pushed Congress to enact their spending plans, and for whatever reason GWB refuses to do so.
Heck, it's gotten to where a lot of people seem to forget the veto even exists. Reagan used the veto 78 times, mostly in order to restrain spending.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.