Posted on 05/09/2006 5:47:25 AM PDT by ConsentofGoverned
Your statement is idiotic. George and his daddy are different people. But maybe that knowledge would overtax your brain.
But even his daddy was not for no national boundaries. The new world order was not about one world government with no national boundaries anyway. It had to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War...that is, what would replace that fact of life that had sort of controlled things for 50 years.
The Bush's aren't John Lennon, for crying out loud. "Imagine there's no countries, it's easy if you try" blah blah blah. Ha ha ha...you are pathetic in your mindless, ad hominem, spooky, scary, "the boogyman Bush's are gonna get you" attacks.
From your lips to God's ears BUMP! :>)!
An utterly absurd lie. But you bought it, "sucker". (Your word for others).
There's no point in trying to debate you ostrich types...But if you want to educate yourself, the information is out there, within reach...
Small victories? No attacks on this country and you think that's small? I guess we have different goalposts.
As to the CIA leakers, have you not noticed the president has appointed people who are going after them aggressively?
There isn't a candiate on the national stage who actually stands a chance at being elected to the presidency who has a plan to deal with immigration. On either side of the aisle.
I don't know why very few politicians are willing to tackle this issue, but that's the way it is.
All he has to do is end trade agreements that have not brought good paying jobs to America, complete his promised Israel Palestine two state peace solution, cut the cost of government, issue an EO requiring illegals to register as Republican voters, have Rumsfeld to do a shuck-n-jive press conference on how Iraq insurgents sticking this fingers in ink wells will bring the troops home before November and announce Mission Accomplished on the WOT and airport security lines are not needed. Don't give up yet conservatives.
"There isn't a candiate on the national stage who actually stands a chance at being elected to the presidency who has a plan to deal with immigration. On either side of the aisle. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>........
Yep Peach it is a mystery that lends support to those who some say are tin foil hat types that there really is a "Shadow Government "controlling our Presidents and Congress.
All his base no longer belong to him.
Amen to that
I agree, but they will translate into support for third party and Independents, which will work to the Dem's favor. It is a tough choice when all we have is a collection on evil, wicked, perverted crooks and another collection of evil, wicked crooks. The big contributors give to both sides and know they will have one of their evil, wicked crooks win all the time. America has become a giant sheep farm with no true choices. They let us fight over issues of passion, while they herd us directly toward the serf farms of world government.
You are absolutely correct. You can't reason with a mule wearing blinders or a turkey gobbling up the party line. It is no wonder that sick politicians repeat the party mantra and then do whatever.
Now I know what you do in your day job: write talking points for the RNC.
Well, leaving our borders open to terrorists and illegals of all stripes makes a joke out of the WOT. Without national security, all the rest is clap trap.
There is a choice, but the problem is, the vast majority of the electorate is as you say.
Sheep
Too much Kool-Adi dearie. I've been a registered and voting GOPer all my life and I am disenchanted with Bush and the Bush-bots can't cover his incompetence. I'll not vote Democrat unless they find some conservative who will close the borders and hang employers of illegals out to dry..But I will not vote GOP either. For the same reason I can't vote for a liberal, I can't vote for a faux conservative...The GOP had it all and has accomplished about as much as they did when they were the minority party. They want to hide behind things like the "60 vote majority" in the Senate as an excuse for lack of accomplishments when if they reinstituted the original filibuster rules they would find the 60 vote majority is a figment. They are Wimps and I cannot and will not support them until they grow some determination and courage.
ROFL. So you'll vote for someone who has no chance to win in order to NOT get your agenda passed. Oh, the irony.
Hummm. Did you read my post? I said I would vote for a Democrat conservative before I would vote (again) for a Republican who will not protect our borders. (IMO a Democrat who will close the borders would whip the GOP silly right now) If the GOP cannot get their act together and acomplish something besides point fingers at the Democrats they are toast and voting for them would truly be a waste of my vote. I seriously mean no GOP will get my vote if they don't get this illegal alien thing right. Laugh all you want. It's not funny and that attitude only will drive others away. How about a rational GOP answer instead of ridicule of the disaffected? (It appears all they can do is to whine that the Democrats will filibuster, boo hoo.) They are zeros with the circle rubbed out. And if you call me a democrat stirring up trouble, it shows how out of touch the GOP has become that they can't hear their base.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.