Posted on 05/07/2006 6:14:11 PM PDT by blam
Quick, someone get the Brits squirt guns. That'll teach the ragheads!
I repeat, "Islam is incompatible with Western Civilization." Totally incompatible, might I add.
there will be a certain amount of killing once we go." I recently asked Iraqi friends what would happen when the British leave. They laughed. "It will be the law of the jungle," said one.
Such hyperbole nonsense -
With that said this WH / GOP PR machines (and our U.S. military PR machine) need to wake the F up and start putting together a complete campaign to re-inform the public along with a daily process of informing the public.
The current press releases aren't working nearly well enough - The MSM simply ignore them and tout ANY negative news items they can over and over -
Islam, at its core, is not compatible with ANY civilization that is not Islamic.
Yup... so much for that "hands off" approach of the Brits.
This is just great....my son is headed there this summer...I wasn't too worried until I saw this on the news and read this....it's gonna be another long year in this household...
In the Middle Ages, Europeans Christians referred to Mohammed as Mahound, a devil. The more I look into it, the more it strikes me that Islam is a Satanic religion.
That's why the Iraqi Security forces are fighting side by side with us against a common enemy...yep, they're ALL so irrational.
No matter what we do for or to these people, in the end, we are still just infidels.
IMO, when the Book of Revelation mentions Babylon, the antichrist, etc., it's Islam and a new, or not so new leader of their's. Islam is Satanic at it's core and that's why they are willing to sacrifice their children's lives for the cause.
honestly, I am not sure why military occupation of an undefeated people while allowing political elements that openly HATE you to control their own territories, use private armies/militias, etc., is going to be expected to have a substantially different result.
Once you allow armed and ruthless radical elements to participate, you are going to see moderate elements (the people who just want to get on with their lives) marginalized if not outright removed from positions of political power.
Whatever else you want to say about this invasion and occupation, it absolutely floors me that the al'sadr variety of cleric have been allowed to flourish, even forming their own militias and holding areas, in the US occupation. Anyone who wants to tell me that this was the original US plan and/or that this is a good thing from the view of US interests please feel free.
It is not hard to see part of the 1991 rationale for leaving hussein in power.
Not to the British sector is he? That is what this is about. The writer reaches way too far when he characterizes all of Iraq. And maybe a tad too far for the British sector. If things are as hopeless there as he says, it's a bad situation but I blame the Brit approach more than anything. If it's broke, fix it. Somebody else fix it if the Brits can't or won't. And may God bless your son, mystery.
His Bn will be running the American base there...wherever that is in Basra....
What does FR think now almost 5 years into this?
News to me there is an American base in Basra. It must not have much to do with local security as that seems to be blamable on the Brits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.