[Coyoteman]

Macroevolution has no evidence. We do not have a demonstrably new species that shows evidence of more complexity (such as an improved system that functions better than it's ancestors or non-degraded element of an organisms DNA that demonstrates a branch of programing, via RMNS, not found in it's ancestor).

No evidence?

You want a new species that has more complexity? How about humans; we have a larger brain that functions better than the brains of our ancestors.

Now, see? That was easy.

[bondserv]

You want a new species that has more complexity? How about humans; we have a larger brain that functions better than the brains of our ancestors.

The point of the over 450 scientists that signed the Discovery Institute document is that Macroevolution via RMNS based on the evidence is not a convincing mechanism to create the complexity we see in living organisms.

The 450 will continue to grow to a point where Scientific journals will be forced to publish their perspectives regarding the evidence.