[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Of course you conveniently ignored the *created them* part."

And you ignored everything else I said (you know, the part where I asked who says that humans were ever anything but male or female...); nothing new there. The created part is not really that important, as theistic evolutionists simply believe that God created life and directed it's evolution through natural means. That's consistent with the evidence; a literal reading of Genesis is not even close to being consistent.

"So is Jesus lying when He said that God created Adam and Eve?"

Since I wasn't there to ask him what he really said, I don't know. Theistic evolutionists don't see that part as being literal. Why do you, when it is genetically impossible for two people living 6,000 years ago to be the ancestors of every living human today without this severe bottleneck having resulted in genetic deformities and showed up in our genome today? We would be FAR closer genetically with one another than we actually are.

[apackof2]

Since I wasn't there to ask him what he really said, I don't know.

Oh but the Lord in His infinite wisdom foreknowledge, knew one of His creation would say that so He provided an account ...Allow me to help you

Gen.2: 7 ...the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

AND

Gen. 2:21-22 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs and closed up the place with flesh. Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.