Skip to comments.
Impatient Mossad warns of 'monster in the making'
worldnetdaily.com ^
| April 30, 2006
| unknown
Posted on 04/30/2006 3:27:40 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
To: all4one
61
posted on
05/01/2006 5:59:57 PM PDT
by
Donna Lee Nardo
(+++ DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS +++)
To: ovrtaxt
Many intelligence experts believe Iran is operating a parallel nuclear program where military applications are secretly under development. GEE! Why would anyone think that.
62
posted on
05/01/2006 6:23:16 PM PDT
by
Fruitbat
To: ovrtaxt
I'm glad someone is injecting some common sense into this worldwide flaccid threat management. I've gotta tell ya, the last country to be concerned should be the US although we should be concerned. If anything, Europe should be far more concerned. They'll be "within reach." Something tells me that Russia isn't "off the hook" either in spite of their support for Iran and their totalitarian regime with Hitler-like intentions.
63
posted on
05/01/2006 6:26:40 PM PDT
by
Fruitbat
To: OldFriend
Not to worry. Just saw a clip of Colin Powell saying that no one has used nuclear weapons since Hiroshima and Nagasaki so he doubts anyone would use it in the 21st. century. I simply LOATHE Powell.
His reasoning is faulty and he couldn't resist that dig at America for using the bomb.
IMO, Japan and Hitler deserved to have a bomb dropped on them. Too bad we didn't take Hitler out sooner.
As for Iran....just ludicrous for him to suggest that it's leader is sane or rational.
If he hand't been averse to taking out Saddam Hussein during the first Gulf War, perhaps we wouldn't be having to clean up his leftover mess.
I'm sure the decision not to go into Iraq was Bush Sr.'s not Powell's. His reasoning is faulty however and for him to hold that view reveals a large naivete. I'm sure he couldn't convince Israel of that either.
64
posted on
05/01/2006 6:30:52 PM PDT
by
Fruitbat
To: sit-rep
Advocating genocide does little to persuade of either the rationality or reasonableness of your positions.
65
posted on
05/01/2006 6:37:18 PM PDT
by
lugsoul
("Crash" - the movie that teaches we are all incurable racists, except when we are not.)
To: Slings and Arrows
moosad... Ol' Wings<-------
Learning to purposly mispill some of these kay woids....
Keeps the eshelon fischers gissing...
Or not --- who nose....
Have a grate daze....
To: Acts 2:38
So you believe that the United States, "The Great Satan", has nothing at risk in permitting a nuclear armed Iran over the next 20 years?
To: Ed_in_NJ
I always knew that there was a good reason why the US has been giving Israel foreign aid to the tune of $3B/year. Having Israel deal with the Iran Problem would be bargain at twice the price....
68
posted on
05/01/2006 7:49:35 PM PDT
by
tracer
To: Neophyte
What's messy about a smooth surface of freshly-formed glass where a desert used to be??
69
posted on
05/01/2006 7:51:37 PM PDT
by
tracer
To: ovrtaxt
Well, there are some very pro-American elements there. Historically, the Persians have had a fair degree of animosity for the Arabs, and it seems that the Iranians are getting sick of the Islamic control freaks.
The question is, is it too little too late?
---
No offense Overtaxt, but I am suspicious of this claim. I hear it all the time, that there is real dissension in Persia, that there are pockets of friendlies. I sure wish someone would give me some credible evidence of this because, quite frankly, I don't think we have the luxury of depending upon so-called "allies" rushing to help us. Maybe I am still stinging from Turkey's about-face when we went to Iraq. I feel like I've been stabbed in the back so many times, I cannot point to a single wound. A lot of respectable folks have said what you say, but I "troll" the net as much as any seeker of truth -- I don't see the credible evidence in my searches and am weary of trusting statement without cold data, given the enemy within, and our national security.
70
posted on
05/01/2006 7:53:20 PM PDT
by
Harrius Magnus
(Enemy #1 = The Leftist holy trinity of multiculturalism, moral equivalence and relativism.)
To: lugsoul
Advocating genocide does little to persuade of either the rationality or reasonableness of your positions.
---
Borrowing words like "genocide" from the Idiots Guide To The Politically Correct Lexicon does little little to persuade that you are to be taken seriously. But it does sound erudite.
71
posted on
05/01/2006 8:01:14 PM PDT
by
Harrius Magnus
(Enemy #1 = The Leftist holy trinity of multiculturalism, moral equivalence and relativism.)
To: Acts 2:38
So you would agree with this point of view:
However much we may sympathize with a small nation confronted by a big and powerful neighbors, we cannot in all circumstances undertake to involve the whole British Empire in a war simply on her account.
-- Neville Chamberlain
To: ovrtaxt; Alouette; All
Prediction how many posts going be on FR when Mossad attack Iran nukes
500
5000
10,000
73
posted on
05/01/2006 8:13:05 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
(I'd rather hunt with Dick Cheney than ride with Ted Kennedy)
To: ovrtaxt
We are in a war for our lives and we twittle and dawdle.
God help us.
74
posted on
05/01/2006 8:19:40 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: lugsoul
Why did you not flag Moderator with me? That is who you're trying to impress with that post ain't it?
Go talk to someone else...
75
posted on
05/01/2006 9:43:35 PM PDT
by
sit-rep
(http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
To: Harrius Magnus
The post advocated killing 70 million people. If that ain't genocide, the word means nothing.
76
posted on
05/01/2006 9:56:35 PM PDT
by
lugsoul
("Crash" - the movie that teaches we are all incurable racists, except when we are not.)
To: sit-rep
Nope. Just pointing out that posting that we should kill 70 million with Nukes in a country that, AFAWK, hasn't attacked us isn't a persuasive position.
77
posted on
05/01/2006 9:57:37 PM PDT
by
lugsoul
("Crash" - the movie that teaches we are all incurable racists, except when we are not.)
To: lugsoul
78
posted on
05/01/2006 10:01:11 PM PDT
by
sit-rep
(http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
To: Harrius Magnus
Borrowing words like "genocide" from the Idiots Guide To The Politically Correct Lexicon does little little to persuade that you are to be taken seriously. But it does sound erudite. < Sam Kinneson >
Good answer... I'm gonna be watchin you!...
< / Sam Kinneson >
79
posted on
05/02/2006 4:09:33 AM PDT
by
sit-rep
(http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
To: GregoryFul
Israel is far stronger than Iran.
Czechoslovakia was not even close to the strength of Germany, although they would have put up a tough fight.
80
posted on
05/02/2006 12:36:52 PM PDT
by
Sometimes A River
(Bush stifles speech to appease Chinese butchers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson