Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

sorry to be so late to this party but this is just showing how pathetic the case was.

This is STRICTLY A PROSECUTOR FACE SAVING.

This only shows the prosecutor had nothing from day one. This is near the terms of the original drug court system. I be Rush does not even have actual reporting probation. It is probably mailing in reporting probation.

Additionally Rush was able to have his own program imposed on this deal, as a lawyer it just shows how weak the prosecutor's case is that they can force the prosecutor to take this.

Net result.
Rush no criminal record. ZERO. He will not even have to answer that he was arrested.

Prosecutor, net result is humiliation and exposure as a hack. I hope the bar complaint moves forward because the bar complaint is 100% independent of the case in the courts.


1,088 posted on 04/30/2006 5:27:24 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1087 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

"Net result.
Rush no criminal record. ZERO. He will not even have to answer that he was arrested. "

So ? Thousands of addicts get their records expunged in this way. You think he will ever have to submit an employment app ?



You seem to forget the most important net result of this -

Rush is off an addiction to drugs that he had at least as far back as 1999, when he first attempted detox.

If his "cover" was blown during the election campaign, might we have been presented with Pres. ALGore ?
The mind shudders at the thought.


1,091 posted on 04/30/2006 5:55:43 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1088 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson