Posted on 04/28/2006 11:23:02 AM PDT by george wythe
Does a focus on family values demand a tight border to protect Americans from outsiders, or an open-door policy to ensure opportunity to the poor of other nations? It is more important to welcome the stranger or to respect the rule of law?
At a forum Thursday hosted by the conservative Christian group Family Research Council, conservative and liberal religious leaders lobbed Bible verses, unable to agree on what Jesus would do about the nation's nearly 12 million illegal immigrants.
Immigrant advocates warned that a crackdown would harm families and violate Scripture. And a lawmaker leading the charge for tougher enforcement decried the impulse to direct "compassion" at foreigners while ignoring the plight of low-income Americans.
(Excerpt) Read more at khou.com ...
Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you. Hebrews 13:17
Huh I ain't the one who wants to put people who grow food or build buildings out of business.
If God's laws are permanent, then why aren't Christians still living the Law of Moses?
It would seem that the laws framed by a "living" constitution would be no more or less changeable than those framed by a Living God.
Important note: The alien remains an alien, does not become a citizen. Second important note: Comparison of 2000 BC to 2000 AD societal and legal issues are not possible since the laws were tailored to fit a middle eastern situation, NOT present day western culture.
Since you are so knowledgeable, then you should be able to cite specific employers. To blanket whole industries as employers of illegals is INACCURATE. Most of your food has never been handled by illegals.
Lots of interesting replies on this one...
I would ask: Can a Christain truly love his neighbors without deporting those who are here illegally? The crimaliens are undercutting the wages of Americans. It is not that they won't do the jobs Americans won't; it's that the crimaliens will do jobs Americans will do for less money because they want to be paid in cash. The result is that you and I have to pay the taxes they and their criminalemployers won't to support all the services the crimaliens demand. In short, being against deporting the crimaliens means the faux Christians are complicit in cheating and stealing from others.
You shall not covet your neighbor's house. You shall not covet ... anything that belongs to your neighbor.
Wouldn't this fall under the premise that a father who loves his child also disciplines him?
These people have broken a myriad of US laws, yet we are expected to reward them? The only ones who want to legalize hem want to continue to exploit them. Either by working them at substandard wages, or using them to increase voter rolls in their favor. If we want to show "love" for them, we must make them responsible for their lawbreaking. To do otherwise would be to teach them they can get what they want by breaking "unjust" laws.
At the very minimum, anyone who wants citizenship should have to return to the country where they hold citizenship and apply through channels, legally. Otherwise, they remain illegals, subject to deportation upon discovery. Property should be forfieted under the law as the "fruits of illegal activity".
Christians ask: Can you love thy neighbor but deport him, too?
Personally, I don't know any Christians who are asking that question.
Okay, go and recruit on a college campus for vegetable pickers jobs or janitors and see how many applications you get.
BTW, how about this below this is a job every American will do, too bad that job is driving GM into bankruptcy because of the UAW.
My first thought was the same --tough love-- but take a look at #35 post; we are actually subsidizing the feudal state in Mexico by NOT dealing with deporting those who are here illegally and not desiring to be citizens here. THAT is unChristian, last time I looked.
"You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife or his male servant or his female servant or his ox or his donkey or anything that belongs to your neighbor." Exd 20:17
I just keep thinking of the verse, "by their fruits you shall know them," which makes me think that by its fruits you shall know illegal immigration. In my town, the following has increased in direct proportion with the influx of illegals:
Bars on doors and windows.
Crime.
Hospitals closing.
Schools overcrowded, dangerous, ineffective.
Gangs.
Graffiti.
Blight, (broken windows, abandoned shopping carts, rusty old cars in front lawns, etc.)
It's happening in neighborhood after neighborhood in the US, formerly nice areas that are now too unsafe to walk through. Could God possibly approve of that? I can't imagine it. Yet it happens everywhere illegal immigration occurs.
Nothing will make me believe that God wants Christians to encourage and embrace illegal immigration. I believe that illegal immigration is a great curse on this country.
The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath and Sepharvaim and settled them in the towns of Samaria to replace the Israelites. They took over Samaria and lived in its towns.Samaritans never completely assimilated into Israel:
They worshiped the LORD, but they also served their own gods in accordance with the customs of the nations from which they had been brought.Samaritans were a fifth column who sabotaged Israelites efforts to rebuilt their city and temple:To this day they persist in their former practices. They neither worship the LORD nor adhere to the decrees and ordinances, the laws and commands that the LORD gave the descendants of Jacob, whom he named Israel.
Then the peoples around them set out to discourage the people of Judah and make them afraid to go on building.Samaritans wrote a letter falsely accusing the Jews of sedition :They hired counselors to work against them and frustrate their plans during the entire reign of Cyrus king of Persia and down to the reign of Darius king of Persia. Ezra 20: 3,4
The king sent this reply:To Rehum the commanding officer, Shimshai the secretary and the rest of their associates living in Samaria and elsewhere in Trans-Euphrates:
Greetings.
The letter you sent us has been read and translated in my presence. 19 I issued an order and a search was made, and it was found that this city has a long history of revolt against kings and has been a place of rebellion and sedition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.