Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sarasota

It also isn't cheaper when you consider it knocks mi/gal down by about 25%.


22 posted on 04/27/2006 11:34:51 AM PDT by TFMcGuire (Either you are an American, or you are a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TFMcGuire

I didn't know this. Got a link to a source?


26 posted on 04/27/2006 11:39:27 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: TFMcGuire
It also isn't cheaper when you consider it knocks mi/gal down by about 25%.

If you're talking about a 10% ethanol blend, 25% sounds awfully high.

EPA MPG estimates for E85 (85% ethanol + 15% gasoline) in flexible-fuel vehicles is typically 30% less than for gasoline. Also, ethanol has 30% less BTU (energy) than gasoline.

So, theoretically, if all else is equal, a 10% ethanol-blend should result in a MPG penalty of less than 5% when compared to straight gasoline.

At any rate, a 25% penalty from a 10% blend doesn't sound right to me.

34 posted on 04/27/2006 11:48:54 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson