To: NormsRevenge
That would be the...ahem...REPUBLICAN controlled House, by the way. In Minnesota, even our Republicans are pansey pink social spenders.
4 posted on
04/26/2006 7:37:32 PM PDT by
WorkingClassFilth
(Di'ver'si'ty (adj.): A compound word derived from the root words: division; perversion; adversity.)
To: WorkingClassFilth
Ha, where *aren't* they big spenders?
5 posted on
04/26/2006 7:38:34 PM PDT by
Sometimes A River
(Bush stifles speech to appease Chinese butchers)
To: WorkingClassFilth
They're still letting ya 'pack heat' tho, right?
Minnesota has always been a "generous" state social program-wise that I can remember.
7 posted on
04/26/2006 7:49:30 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi)
To: WorkingClassFilth
In Minnesota, even our Republicans are pansey pink social spenders.Would to GOD they were that way ONLY in Minnesota.
To: WorkingClassFilth
MPR has the roll call up on their web site:
http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/projects/ongoing/votetracker/issue_view.php?id=52#vote-137 I'm sorry to say that Mike Charron voted for it, but relieved to see that my old buddy Ray Vandeveer voted against it.
At least they didn't vote to spend money out of the state treasury for this thing, at least not right away. I'm confident that it will take at least two years for the residents of Hennepin county to state complaining about the unfair tax burden and demand that the funding burden get shifted to the rest of the state.
18 posted on
04/26/2006 8:27:14 PM PDT by
brbethke
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson