Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KurtZ

I may be one of the few that agrees with you here... ;)

Couple of questions as I can't remember if I heard them correctly or not.

1. Isn't the tax to pay for the Metrodome still on the books even though that stadium has been paid for for years? If true (and I thought it was) why isn't anybody saying a thing about this?

2. Nobody discusses the fact that opposing teams have to pay MN state taxes on paychecks received. The State never mentions the rewards they have reaped from that for years. That's why I don't have a problem with Pohlad. The State of Minnesota has enjoyed a tax stream they don't have to answer to their constituents for.

I love baseball but have not gone to a game in 3 years because the stadium is an embarrasment (and refuse to sit indoors during the MN summer). Personally I think a larger tax on beer and food in the downtown area bars and resturants would work better ($.05 more per drink? Is anyone really going to complain?).


31 posted on 04/27/2006 6:33:44 AM PDT by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: MNlurker
People have to look at this as an investment for Hennipen County. The tax revenue a new stadium will generate will eventually outweigh the cost.
33 posted on 04/27/2006 3:38:11 PM PDT by KurtZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson