Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWOJackson
No. Not the same at all.

I was simply saying GWB, as the son of Bush 41, is not an "out of the Beltway entity".---And, an out of the Beltway entity is my hope for a Republican revival in 2008.

I was not commenting on anyone's "conservative" credentials.

169 posted on 04/26/2006 6:40:53 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: Right_in_Virginia
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you were one of the "true" or "real" crowd, just how difinitions can get blurred.

The only connection I see between George One and George Two is the name. George Two was out in the business world when Pop became a Washington insider (and if you look back at that One may have lived in DC and worked there for years but was he every really that much of an insider).

George Two has never lived/worked in DC, was a successful business man then successful state governor before coming to DC.

180 posted on 04/26/2006 6:44:33 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: Right_in_Virginia
I was simply saying GWB, as the son of Bush 41, is not an "out of the Beltway entity".---And, an out of the Beltway entity is my hope for a Republican revival in 2008.

Tom Tancredo has been "inside the Beltway" longer than Bush 43 has.

210 posted on 04/26/2006 6:56:02 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson