Skip to comments.
McCarthy in Denial -- DNC May Set Up McCarthy Legal Defense Fund
The American Spectator ^
| April 26, 2006
| The Prowler
Posted on 04/26/2006 10:55:39 AM PDT by Sam Hill
McCarthy in Denial
By The Prowler
4/26/2006 12:08:54 AM
Outed CIA analyst Mary McCarthy is denying through her lawyers that she was the source for the Washington Post's Dana Priest in revealing the secret prisons that housed terrorists overseas. McCarthy's lawyers, though, aren't throwing cold water on the notion that McCarthy may have had political inclinations and agendas that came into play with what even they termed unauthorized or undisclosed contacts with journalists.
Perhaps that's why the Howard Dean and others at the Democrat National Committee are looking to some of their donors to set up a legal defense fund for McCarthy.
"If Scooter Libby can have a legal defense fund and website, then McCarthy should have one too," says a DNC staffer. "The DNC wouldn't set it up, we'd have some of our donors do it on the outside. There are plenty of consultants willing to help on this one, we think." ...
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; denial; leaks; marymccarthy; tas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: demlosers
Just heard the CIA may not prosecute because they don't want to discuss what was leaked in open court. :-(
41
posted on
04/26/2006 12:10:40 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Sam Hill
"McCarthy's lawyers..." doesn't name them. Could they be the same lawyers that are defending the other traitors, the Clintons?
42
posted on
04/26/2006 12:11:27 PM PDT
by
Fruit of the Spirit
(With the threat of amnesty comes the threat of revolution.)
To: rhombus
Just heard the CIA may not prosecute because they don't want to discuss what was leaked in open court. :-(Anyone who advances this argument doesn't have the brainpower to work in intelligence, and should be fired immediately.
By definition, the traitor has already leaked all of it to God knows who, so it's a moot --- and very dumb --- point.
D'OH!
43
posted on
04/26/2006 12:23:32 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
To: Publius6961
Isn't this a similar problem as with Padilla?
44
posted on
04/26/2006 12:25:45 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: MNJohnnie
Curious, WHY are the Democrats all rushing to Mary's defense? She knows where the bodies are buried.
45
posted on
04/26/2006 12:28:22 PM PDT
by
subterfuge
(Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
To: steve7
Re#34 I wouldn't take that bet. Heck, Joe Wilson was on staff. Thank heavens they didn't win...
46
posted on
04/26/2006 12:29:07 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
To: Darkwolf377
Democrats = Culture of Treason.
Pass it on.
47
posted on
04/26/2006 1:17:37 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Democrats = The Culture of Treason)
To: EQAndyBuzz
hehe... type "culture of treason" in your favorite search engine...
48
posted on
04/26/2006 2:03:13 PM PDT
by
fhlh
(Polls are for Strippers.)
To: All
Larry Johnson always goes out of his way to claim he is a registered Republican and that he has contributed heavily to the GOP in the past.
Oddly enough, the FEC has no records of any contributions from him to the GOP. They do, however list these:
JOHNSON, LARRY
BETHESDA, MD 20817
DEAN, HOWARD
VIA DEAN FOR AMERICA
12/27/2003 311.00 24990407496
JOHNSON, LARRY C
BETHESDA, MD 20817
BERG AND ASSOCIATES/MANAGING MEMB
MARCINKOWSKI, JAMES
VIA MARCINKOWSKI FOR CONGRESS
12/19/2005 2000.00 26980097211
The second one is definitely from our boy, Larry. It is for a Democrat who trained with Johnson and Plame at the CIA.
And he is almost as rabid as Larry about the (non-leak) leak of her (non-covert) desk jockey job at CIA.
Marcinkowski for Congress
http://www.marcinkowskiforcongress.com/index.asp
To be fair, the Dean contribution could be from some other Larry Johnson in that zip code. But what are the odds?
49
posted on
04/26/2006 2:05:48 PM PDT
by
Sam Hill
To: Enchante; Mo1
That just needs to be said a little LOUDER:
This supposedly non-partisan professional (HA HA) is instantly embraced by the DNC......... how revealing is THAT?
50
posted on
04/26/2006 2:13:57 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Sam Hill
To: Incorrigible
To: FormerACLUmember
To: rhombus
Just exchanged email with a liberal friend who defended her with the usual "speaking truth to power" arguments. He was glad she "spoke out" about torture in secret prisons. Because I objected to her law-breaking, I was, ergo in favor of torture. And that THIS administration needs to learn how to deal with dissent. I feel like I was tortured
Ask your friend if it makes sense to amend the CIA employment contract to include the following:
"You may leak confidential matters if you are opposed to government policy, if you feel honor-bound to do so, or if you have a grudge against management."
Then ask them if our allies would want to share any of their secrets with an agency that had such an employment agreement.
54
posted on
04/26/2006 3:40:19 PM PDT
by
cgbg
(Should traitors live long enough to have book deals?)
To: cgbg; onyx; nutmeg; Howlin
"Should traitors live long enough to have book deals?"
GREAT TAGLINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
55
posted on
04/26/2006 3:52:09 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Blurblogger
NO BOOK DEALS - OR PROFITEERING.
56
posted on
04/26/2006 3:54:03 PM PDT
by
onyx
(MARY MC CHRISTMAS everybody!)
To: Sam Hill; eureka!; All
Great post; thanks for the link; thanks to all contributors, posters and lurkers.
57
posted on
04/26/2006 6:35:36 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
58
posted on
04/26/2006 10:08:09 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: PGalt
Re#57 'tis nothing. It's what makes this place so great...
59
posted on
04/27/2006 7:31:12 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
To: Sam Hill
Former colleagues described her as cautious and respected. "I thought she was a competent, quiet, good intelligence officer," said Richard J. Kerr, a former deputy CIA director who worked with McCarthy. "She was certainly someone you had respect for and saw not as an ideologue or someone who would end up putting herself in this position."He retired in 1992. I appreciate his memories of those days in the distant past. I also wonder about the context of the question and answer.
60
posted on
04/27/2006 7:39:19 AM PDT
by
Stentor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson