Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCarthy in Denial -- DNC May Set Up McCarthy Legal Defense Fund
The American Spectator ^ | April 26, 2006 | The Prowler

Posted on 04/26/2006 10:55:39 AM PDT by Sam Hill

McCarthy in Denial

By The Prowler
4/26/2006 12:08:54 AM

Outed CIA analyst Mary McCarthy is denying through her lawyers that she was the source for the Washington Post's Dana Priest in revealing the secret prisons that housed terrorists overseas. McCarthy's lawyers, though, aren't throwing cold water on the notion that McCarthy may have had political inclinations and agendas that came into play with what even they termed unauthorized or undisclosed contacts with journalists.

Perhaps that's why the Howard Dean and others at the Democrat National Committee are looking to some of their donors to set up a legal defense fund for McCarthy.

"If Scooter Libby can have a legal defense fund and website, then McCarthy should have one too," says a DNC staffer. "The DNC wouldn't set it up, we'd have some of our donors do it on the outside. There are plenty of consultants willing to help on this one, we think." ...

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; denial; leaks; marymccarthy; tas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: demlosers

Just heard the CIA may not prosecute because they don't want to discuss what was leaked in open court. :-(


41 posted on 04/26/2006 12:10:40 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

"McCarthy's lawyers..." doesn't name them. Could they be the same lawyers that are defending the other traitors, the Clintons?


42 posted on 04/26/2006 12:11:27 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit (With the threat of amnesty comes the threat of revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Just heard the CIA may not prosecute because they don't want to discuss what was leaked in open court. :-(

Anyone who advances this argument doesn't have the brainpower to work in intelligence, and should be fired immediately.

By definition, the traitor has already leaked all of it to God knows who, so it's a moot --- and very dumb --- point.

D'OH!

43 posted on 04/26/2006 12:23:32 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Isn't this a similar problem as with Padilla?


44 posted on 04/26/2006 12:25:45 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Curious, WHY are the Democrats all rushing to Mary's defense?

She knows where the bodies are buried.

45 posted on 04/26/2006 12:28:22 PM PDT by subterfuge (Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steve7

Re#34 I wouldn't take that bet. Heck, Joe Wilson was on staff. Thank heavens they didn't win...


46 posted on 04/26/2006 12:29:07 PM PDT by eureka! (Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Democrats = Culture of Treason.

Pass it on.


47 posted on 04/26/2006 1:17:37 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats = The Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

hehe... type "culture of treason" in your favorite search engine...


48 posted on 04/26/2006 2:03:13 PM PDT by fhlh (Polls are for Strippers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: All
Larry Johnson always goes out of his way to claim he is a registered Republican and that he has contributed heavily to the GOP in the past.

Oddly enough, the FEC has no records of any contributions from him to the GOP. They do, however list these:

JOHNSON, LARRY
BETHESDA, MD 20817

DEAN, HOWARD
VIA DEAN FOR AMERICA
12/27/2003 311.00 24990407496

JOHNSON, LARRY C
BETHESDA, MD 20817
BERG AND ASSOCIATES/MANAGING MEMB

MARCINKOWSKI, JAMES
VIA MARCINKOWSKI FOR CONGRESS
12/19/2005 2000.00 26980097211

The second one is definitely from our boy, Larry. It is for a Democrat who trained with Johnson and Plame at the CIA.

And he is almost as rabid as Larry about the (non-leak) leak of her (non-covert) desk jockey job at CIA.

Marcinkowski for Congress
http://www.marcinkowskiforcongress.com/index.asp

To be fair, the Dean contribution could be from some other Larry Johnson in that zip code. But what are the odds?

49 posted on 04/26/2006 2:05:48 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Enchante; Mo1
That just needs to be said a little LOUDER:





This supposedly non-partisan professional (HA HA) is instantly embraced by the DNC......... how revealing is THAT?

50 posted on 04/26/2006 2:13:57 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Thanks for the ping.


51 posted on 04/26/2006 2:59:45 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

bttt


52 posted on 04/26/2006 3:01:39 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

bttt


53 posted on 04/26/2006 3:05:47 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Just exchanged email with a liberal friend who defended her with the usual "speaking truth to power" arguments. He was glad she "spoke out" about torture in secret prisons. Because I objected to her law-breaking, I was, ergo in favor of torture. And that THIS administration needs to learn how to deal with dissent. I feel like I was tortured

Ask your friend if it makes sense to amend the CIA employment contract to include the following:

"You may leak confidential matters if you are opposed to government policy, if you feel honor-bound to do so, or if you have a grudge against management."

Then ask them if our allies would want to share any of their secrets with an agency that had such an employment agreement.
54 posted on 04/26/2006 3:40:19 PM PDT by cgbg (Should traitors live long enough to have book deals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cgbg; onyx; nutmeg; Howlin

"Should traitors live long enough to have book deals?"


GREAT TAGLINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!


55 posted on 04/26/2006 3:52:09 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

NO BOOK DEALS - OR PROFITEERING.


56 posted on 04/26/2006 3:54:03 PM PDT by onyx (MARY MC CHRISTMAS everybody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill; eureka!; All

Great post; thanks for the link; thanks to all contributors, posters and lurkers.


57 posted on 04/26/2006 6:35:36 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

58 posted on 04/26/2006 10:08:09 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Re#57 'tis nothing. It's what makes this place so great...


59 posted on 04/27/2006 7:31:12 AM PDT by eureka! (Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
Former colleagues described her as cautious and respected. "I thought she was a competent, quiet, good intelligence officer," said Richard J. Kerr, a former deputy CIA director who worked with McCarthy. "She was certainly someone you had respect for and saw not as an ideologue or someone who would end up putting herself in this position."

He retired in 1992. I appreciate his memories of those days in the distant past. I also wonder about the context of the question and answer.

60 posted on 04/27/2006 7:39:19 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson