Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mcshot; All

Is it just me or do others find themselves wondering why the fire department was extracting him instead of military personell????

Something doesn't fit imho


40 posted on 04/25/2006 6:11:58 PM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: BlueStateDepression

I suspect it is the Air Force "Fire Department".


41 posted on 04/25/2006 6:16:20 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateDepression

The Air Force has fire fighters.


47 posted on 04/25/2006 7:17:13 PM PDT by TankerKC (Sorry I missed the protest, I had to work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateDepression
why the fire department was extracting him instead of military personell????

Thirty years ago they'd have been military personnel, but as part of the cutbacks in the eighties and nineties jobs that didn't absolutely have to be done by a sworn service member were made civil service. Supposedlt this saves money; an Airman 1c costs less than a civlian fireman, but you need to recruit a new airman every four years or so.

And the reason the fire guys do it, is simple: they have training on extracting people from airplanes. The F-22s crew chief doesn't. In fact, he or she was in tears just about then.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

54 posted on 04/25/2006 9:24:17 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F (Fighting Democrats, huh? Where the hell were they when I was fighting?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson