Replies

I have often in this exchange been astonished at your utter disregard for the meaning of words. You seem to think that you can string them in series without regard to what people will think when they read them. Here is the latest example which proves what a time waste it is to try to reason with you.

At 6:10:51 you posted this:

I did not call for you to refrain from posting on this or any thread. Not once.

Had you forgotten that on 2:18:27 you had posted thus (first quoting NathanR and then in the second paragraph noting your approval of what you had quoted):

I think that anyone with your name should stay out of immigration threads, and threads that the KKK might have a position on.

Thank you, NathanR. Yours is a very well-stated encapsulation of the point I was making.

Had you forgotten? Did you think we would forget? Madam, I am done with you. You are either a liar or afflicted. In either case I have no more time for you.

Had you forgotten? Did you think we would forget?

Of course not! I agreed with the overall point (which you clearly understand) is that your participation in such discussions while using the name and image of the founder of the KKK is inflamatory.

I'm delighted you finally resorted to attacking me on a personal level, because it reinforces -- for me, at least -- the idea that you probably have more in common with your hero than you may wish to let on.

Now I am done with you.