Replies

[ Not exactly, ~~Ockhams~~ Occam's Razor demands the simplest explanation is generally the correct answer. In this case, I believe the simplest is that there is a lot of bitter people doing what they can do undercut the President. A 'Shadow Government' is not even close to a simple explanation. Not saying it isn't true, but it is a little 'far fetched'. ]

So THEN, you do not believe that Bush is PART of the shadow givernment?... Clue: If there was a shadow givernment BUSH would HAVE to part of it.. Thats HOW he became President..

Another clue; Importing massive quantites of proto democrats as illegal and legal aliens is the ONLY thing the democrats and Bush agree on.. well there are few other minor things like increasing BIG GIVERMENT.. Why? would a republican President be FOR (importing) multi millions of NEW DEMOCRATS.. Why?.. A pregnant question.. i.e. because the shadow givernment WANTS THAT TO HAPPEN..

So THEN, you do not believe that Bush is PART of the shadow givernment?... Clue: If there was a shadow givernment BUSH would HAVE to part of it.. Thats HOW he became President..
If Bush is a part of a 'shadow government' then it isn't shadow. He became President because he was elected President.

Another clue; Importing massive quantites of proto democrats as illegal and legal aliens is the ONLY thing the democrats and Bush agree on.. well there are few other minor things like increasing BIG GIVERMENT.. Why? would a republican President be FOR (importing) multi millions of NEW DEMOCRATS.. Why?.. A pregnant question.. i.e. because the shadow givernment WANTS THAT TO HAPPEN..
Actually, most of these are myths. increasing 'big' government for example. First, the rate of spending in relation to the GDP is a steady trend and hasn't seen a spike since President Bush was elected. The rate of spending not going down can be blamed on congress. They are very bad about attaching pork to necessary bills. If the President killed the pork, he would also kill necessary bills. Blame the lack of line item veto and typical politics for that.

As for immigration, this isn't a party line issue. You'll find many on the Right and Left agreeing with the President and many on the Right and Left disagreeing with the President, all (Right and Left) using the same reasoning.

Is this the "24" thread?/s