He finally showed some damages. They still required a third party besides Sony, who was more at fault for them.
"Finally" showed some damages?
You posted this a few HOURS ago:
>I guess you could sue Sony, but since there were no damages
The settlement agreement is from MONTHS ago, but a few HOURS ago, according to you, there were no damages, even though there's an inconvenient date of...12/27/05.
On 4/26/06, according to you, 'no damages.'
I can only hope you're not in the business of writing software.
You might want to explain to anyone who's interested why anyone should trust one word you say. I'm not. Have a great day.