Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

So, Doug, what do we know about Judge Munoz who is hearing this case? Is he fair? And MSM will ignore this now, I mean they have the Duke rape case and all.LOL. But come 2007, when this civil case comes to court surely there will be media intrest with the list of folks who will have depositions or testify. And I have always felt sorry for Chelsea. It was none of her doing to be born into a home of chronic liars.
Do you think the case will effect her run for the Presidency? I mean no case would be good for a canidate. But this case could have serious implications about her ethics if it can be proven she lied about her relationship to Peter Paul.


30 posted on 04/23/2006 8:57:18 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lexington minuteman 1775

I don't know too much about Munoz. He seemed like a fair guy, but he should have kept Hillary in the case as a defendant. Part of the problem was that, when Judicial Watch was handling this, they filed a very poorly draw case. Those SOBs really screwed it up. And, they did not spend the millions and millions raised for Peter's case on Peter's case.


43 posted on 04/23/2006 9:27:52 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson