Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Between the Lines

I would think that anything deemed "obscene" would be something that is displayed in public. I wonder why some states want to regulate what is private? I can certainly understand the public advertising and display or use of such a device, but until they start putting cameras in peoples' private bedrooms, this is a sick joke of a law.


322 posted on 04/24/2006 7:24:58 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]


http://www.scstatehouse.net/sess116_2005-2006/bills/4830.htm

Don't have time to read the whole thread to see if it has already been posted but above is link to Comrade Davenport's proposed modification of state law.

323 posted on 04/24/2006 7:47:36 AM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson