Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

Your argument only makes sense if the law was stating you had to buy sex toys when you didn't want them. If you don't want them, don't buy them. If you want them, there should be no prohibtion against buying them: like cigarettes, I suppose.


22 posted on 04/23/2006 6:14:44 AM PDT by Salo (Then they came for the inflatables....but I was silent because I was not an inflatable....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Salo
"Your argument only makes sense if the law was stating you had to buy sex toys when you didn't want them."

Your argument only makes sense if you think it would be OK to have a crack house next door to you, prostitutes walking up and down your sidewalk, and an OTB parlor across the street.

If you don't want them, don't buy them.

30 posted on 04/23/2006 6:25:42 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Salo; robertpaulsen

Salo, you probably figured this out already--but RP is one of the resident totalitarians.


166 posted on 04/23/2006 12:03:52 PM PDT by flada (Posting in a manner reminiscent of Jen-gis Kahn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson