By the way, I see you entirely ignored my examples
I didn't ignore them, I said that States can write reasonable regulations about such practices.
'By the way', I see you ignored most of my answers to your questions on that post. Cat got your tongue?
Why can a state write reasonable regulations about, say, gay marriage, and not the sale of dildos? What's the difference?
You didn't answer any of the questions. You gave some bogus vague "reasonable regulation" garbage.
If you're going to base your argument on "reasonableness," that's stupid--it proves my point--reasonableness is subjective. If the People of the State of South Carolina think that a reasonable regulation on the sale of dildos is to ban the sale, then who are we to question that?
You can't draw a line based on reasonableness. That's madness; there would be a million different lines based on a million different views of what is reasonable. Can't work.