Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/23/2006 5:47:04 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Crackingham; upchuck; traviskicks

I guess since our efficient and wonderful SC state government has solved all of the other problems the state had, it's time to ban sex toys.


2 posted on 04/23/2006 5:51:04 AM PDT by Salo (First they came for the dildos....but I was silent because I was not a dildo....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Dumb...


3 posted on 04/23/2006 5:51:48 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

A goofy bill, which yet falls short of “the most terrible thing in the world.”


4 posted on 04/23/2006 5:51:51 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

bump


5 posted on 04/23/2006 5:52:13 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

" The South Carolina bill, proposed by Republican Rep. Ralph Davenport, would make it a felony to sell devices ..."

A felony ???? A married couple born the " land of the free " wants to play with some " sex toys " and we're going to make it a felony to sell such toys ??? Is this really a PRIORITY ???? Unreal . Ralph is a jerk .


6 posted on 04/23/2006 5:52:58 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
"That would be the most terrible thing in the world," said Ms. Gillespie, an employee the Anderson shop.

On the bright side, produce markets would be bustling.

7 posted on 04/23/2006 5:54:12 AM PDT by TheRightGuy (ERROR CODE 018974523: Random Tagline Compiler Failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

>>>>Republican Rep. Ralph Davenport, would make it a felony to sell devices used primarily for sexual stimulation

Maybe his next piece of legislation should be to ban tight jeans and push-up bras, so nobody will get turned on by looking. Then there are the nylon nighties.....

When a favorite insult by dems is to call opponents "taliban republicans", this dip makes it easy for them.


8 posted on 04/23/2006 5:54:30 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Which religious wacko's are for this?


9 posted on 04/23/2006 5:56:09 AM PDT by FightThePower!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Article author Seanna Adcox may have to change her name if the bill passes.


10 posted on 04/23/2006 5:57:31 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Good!


11 posted on 04/23/2006 5:57:36 AM PDT by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
"The people who are riding us so hard...."

Interesting choice of words, madam!
13 posted on 04/23/2006 6:01:02 AM PDT by jdm (Trading Helen Thomas pics online since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; Abbeville Conservative; acf2906; ...
South Carolina Ping

Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.
14 posted on 04/23/2006 6:04:01 AM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
"We are supposed to be in a free country ..."

We are. You happen to be in a not-so-free state.

Now, the beauty of federalism is ... you can move to another state if this issue is that important to you!

Certainly the people of South Carolina can decide through the legislative process how they want to live. You wouldn't deny them that, would you?

Are you saying that you should you be allowed to force your perversions on them in the name of "freedom"? What, freedom for me but not for thee?

17 posted on 04/23/2006 6:08:44 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

I would love to know which version of Christianity Rep. Davenport subscribes to and what Biblical passage he is basing this on.


18 posted on 04/23/2006 6:10:01 AM PDT by opticks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Worried about the wrong thing.


19 posted on 04/23/2006 6:11:06 AM PDT by Jackknife ( "I bet after seeing us, George Washington would sue us for calling him 'father'." —Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Hmmmmm. . . guess that just leaves the rental market.


20 posted on 04/23/2006 6:11:24 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
After nine months of research and seven roads trips to check out the ambiance, I chose to retire to this wonderful state in September, 2003.

This is the first news that makes me wonder.

In the article, Ms. Gillespie says she's flabbergasted.

Me, I just wonder why some people think this is needed?

I was unaware the trafficking in and the use of sex toys was destroying South Carolina.

I'm just so ashamed. What shall I say when I'm asked what state I'm from?

PS to #12 above. Fantastic, targeted tag line :)

23 posted on 04/23/2006 6:17:51 AM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Yo Ralphie you can't do this, It's unconstitutional.
U.S. Constitution:
Amendment II:
A sexually satisfied population, being necessary for the sanity of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Sex Toys, shall not be infringed.
Wait... I think I may have looked up the wrong U.S. Constitution. My reference was Hustler Magazine. I better double check this. Be back in a sec.....

;-)

24 posted on 04/23/2006 6:18:00 AM PDT by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Somebody needs to investigate Republican Rep. Ralph Davenport, 'cause his mind is in OUR bedrooms. Disgusting!

I can see it now: Black clad cops with machine guns, bursting into someone's house, shouting "drop the vibrator or we'll shoot".

Nanny statism at its finest.

I'll bet Ralph's wife has never had an orgasm. Poor woman!


25 posted on 04/23/2006 6:18:16 AM PDT by Mister Da (Nuke 'em til they glow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Thus creating a sex toy black market?

Wonder what the penalty will be for driving in SC with a loaded sex toy in your car?

ROFOL!


26 posted on 04/23/2006 6:18:33 AM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson