Posted on 04/19/2006 9:24:30 PM PDT by calcowgirl
LOS ANGELES – Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Wednesday embraced Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's school takeover plan, giving the mayor a highly visible ally in his drive to gain control of the Los Angeles Unified School District.
“Mayor Villaraigosa has shown bold leadership,” the Republican governor told reporters in Sacramento. “This is exactly the kind of thing that ought to be done.
“I am 100 percent behind him on this and if there's a bill that comes down here, I will sign that,” Schwarzenegger said. “We want to help him in that move, because we all know that it is inexcusable that we have more than 30 percent of our students drop out of school.”
Schwarzenegger last year lined up behind a plan pushed by then-mayoral candidate Bob Hertzberg to break up the sprawling Los Angeles Unified School District, the nation's second-largest school system. Villaraigosa on Tuesday urged the Legislature to strip the district of much of its power and shift it to his office.
With a difficult re-election campaign ahead, Schwarzenegger's support for the school plan has the potential to yield political benefits. Education is routinely ranked among the top issues with voters, and the governor has long been accused by critics of shortchanging schools, a claim he disputes. The Los Angeles proposal is being pushed by a widely popular Hispanic mayor in a heavily Democratic city, two voter groups Schwarzenegger has been courting in his bid to win a second term.
Villaraigosa aides privately briefed the governor's staff on the school proposal earlier this week, and the mayor recently pitched the plan to Schwarzenegger.
“Obviously, he said he would look forward to his support,” said Villaraigosa spokeswoman Janelle Erickson. “The mayor is very thrilled with the bipartisan support.”
Villaraigosa's proposal, modeled on mayoral takeovers in Chicago, Boston and New York City, would create a council of mayors from cities within the district that would oversee the schools. As leader of the largest city, Los Angeles' mayor would have the most clout.
A schools superintendent would be appointed by the mayoral council to run the district's day-to-day operations. The elected school board would remain, but in a greatly diminished role.
Critics call the mayor's proposal a power grab, and it has strained his relationships with district officials and the teachers union. Villaraigosa himself has said he expects his proposal will result in a political war over control of Los Angeles schools.
It's a good idea. Villaragosa is no conservative, but he seems to at least be a sensible sort, and the school board from what I hear is off-the-charts nuts.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20060419-0018-ca-villaraigosa-schools.html
L.A. mayor urges Legislature to give him control of schools
By Michael R. Blood
ASSOCIATED PRESS
12:18 a.m. April 19, 2006
LOS ANGELES – Saying voters must be able to hold one person accountable, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa called on the state Legislature to strip the Los Angeles Unified School District of most of its power and hand it over to his office.
“Voters need to be able to hire and fire one person accountable to parents, teachers and taxpayers,” the mayor said in a State of the City speech delivered Tuesday at a South Los Angeles school.
“Unless we face the crisis in our schools, we will never truly hold ourselves to account,” Villaraigosa said. “We can't be a great global city if we lose half of our work force before they graduate from high school.”
His remarks, the centerpiece of his first State of the City speech, represent Villaraigosa's most detailed statements to date about his plan to wrest control of the schools from the Board of Education. The proposal is loosely modeled on mayoral takeovers in Chicago, Boston and New York City.
Although anchored to Los Angeles, the sprawling district covers all or part of more than two dozen smaller suburban cities. With nearly 730,000 students, it is the nation's second-largest, behind New York City's.
Critics call the mayor's proposal a power grab, and it has strained his relationships with district officials and the teachers union. Villaraigosa himself has said he expects his proposal will result in a political war over control of Los Angeles schools.
Superintendent Roy Romer disputed the mayor's claims that the school board is unaccountable. Board members, he said, think a mayoral takeover “isn't a good idea.”
If enacted, the complex plan would upend a school system Villaraigosa blames for low test scores and a high dropout rate.
Mayoral aides said Villaraigosa plans to unveil proposed state legislation within weeks. It wasn't immediately clear if voters would ultimately have to sign off on any changes the Legislature might make. Under Villaraigosa's proposal, the Legislature would have to review the changes after six years and vote on whether to reauthorize them.
Villaraigosa said his proposal would create a council of mayors from cities within the district that would oversee the schools. As leader of the largest city, Los Angeles' mayor would have the most clout.
The school superintendent would be appointed by the mayoral council and would be in charge of the district's day-to-day operations. The elected school board would remain, but in a greatly diminished role.
Villaraigosa said Tuesday the board would become a point of contact for parents, reviewing complaints, overseeing student discipline and handling student transfer matters.
The mayor also said he wants to lengthen the school day and year, shift more funding from administration to classrooms and require students to wear uniforms.
The first-term mayor has made a takeover of the Los Angeles Unified School District one of his top priorities, arguing that the future of the city depends on improving student achievement. But until Tuesday he had provided few details of how he would take control of the district's elected school board or how a district under his control would operate.
"Saying voters must be able to hold one person accountable, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa called on the state Legislature to strip the Los Angeles Unified School District of most of its power and hand it over to his office."
Which is what the Feds should butt out of education (and a lot of other things) - because there is absolutely no one who can be held accountable for anything.
LOVE IT! I remmeber when we were required to wear what we called 'zoot suits' for gym class. As young teenage girls it was a real ego crusher and placed the focus right where it needed to be: sweating and athleticism. I hated them, but I never had to fret about what to wear, nor spend dollars on other clothing. Would be interesting to see how something like this pans out in this 'all how you look', mass ego driven city of mine.
As a product of LAUSD (K-12), all I can say is about time!!!
I always tell people look at New York city schools. There the school is commanded by the Mayor of New York. New York schools were bad before the mayor took over. Now, the schools are worse than ever. Just imagine schools if the mayor of Los Angeles is allowed to take over. The schools will become more dysfunctional because of the politics of the office. The schools are already bad and this will make it worse. There is also a danger that schools might be used to advance his political ideology What is needed is a corporate approach to running a school system where politics is a non starter. The problem, the taxpayers have allowed the schools to become vehicles for politicans who want to elected to higher office. A very good example is Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg. Before she became an Assemblywoman, she was the head of the LAUSD school board. She used her position on the school board as a vehicle to become Assemblywoman.The schools will become more politicized if the schools are given to the mayor of Los Angeles. He may use new position for his higher aspirations to become Governor. Politics needs to say out of the classroom and the schools need much more oversight by state and federal regulators. What is needed is a our schools to be managed like a coproration. If the lead educator fails the children, then they must held accountable and then be fired. We do not need more mismanagement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.