Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
I called "troll" back in 620. NO reason to change.

Please define "troll," if you would please.
700 posted on 04/18/2006 12:30:49 PM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies ]


To: Lucky Dog

I would define troll as someone who comes here with a list of questions that are not intended to be answered.

You ask some questions that have been difficult to answer, but which are now part of the history of biology. You ask them as if any failure on our part is grounds to justify not believing an answer is available.

You could be informing yourself in private. There are plenty of resourses, both online and offline. But you choose to ask them in a tone that telegraphs your disinclination to accept the answers.

You could, if you were genuinely interested in the answers, ask for references. If you have, as you claim, read outside material and still don't understand the material, you could enroll in some classes on the subject.

Frankly, your followup questions don't convince me that you have made much effort to understand.


704 posted on 04/18/2006 1:00:46 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson