[CarolinaGuitarman]

"He could be a pre-Darwinian theistic evolutionist."

But he isn't. Also, the multiple, sequential creations of the pre-Darwinians isn't really evolution. It's still essentialist in nature. Species (or kinds) are still considered fixed.

I'm done with this one anyway. How do you argue with someone who says,

""Moreover, you haven't taken time to study time and compare it with quantum mechanics. The evidence in that regard points to an intersection between time and eternity which in turn, is reason to believe anything goes when it comes to history."

?

If anything goes, than the debate is over. Every claim is as good as any other.

Night!

[js1138]

I've set a daily limit of Fester posts.