To: js1138
From your comment, it appears that you wish to disengage from the discussion. I am sorry you feel so, but so be it, if that is, indeed, your intent.
However, as a parting thought, I would remind you that "reading and being instructed" does not in any sense imply agreement with such reading and instruction after a critical analysis.
Good Day
To: Lucky Dog
However, as a parting thought, I would remind you that "reading and being instructed" does not in any sense imply agreement with such reading and instruction after a critical analysis.
I do not believe that anyone suggested such a thing. The point made was that you do not appear to be knowledgable regarding the subject that you are criticizing. I am perplexed as to why a number of creationists seem to believe that criticisms of their misstatements regarding the theory of evolution are a result of their lack of acceptance of the validity of the theory rather than their demonstratable ignorance of it.
583 posted on
04/17/2006 12:41:20 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Lucky Dog
I remainin the discussion. I have the impression, however, that you have a list of killer arguments and are trying them out. You seem quite intelligent, but rather uninformed about the history of biology. You seem unaware that your lines of discussion have been examined by thousands of researchers over a couple hundred years. Science is not something that you can come into from the outside and blow people away. They've seen it before.
601 posted on
04/17/2006 2:29:10 PM PDT by
js1138
(~()):~)>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson