To: Alter Kaker
The environment and potential sexual partners each select.
Nope the question still remains these could simply predesigned traits that existed in these sexual partners. "After their own kind" as the book of Genesis would say.
This example you gave Does not undermine Intelligent Design at all.
To: SirLinksalot
Nope the question still remains these could simply predesigned traits that existed in these sexual partners. "After their own kind" as the book of Genesis would say. This example you gave Does not undermine Intelligent Design at all.You didn't ask me to undermine ID, you asked me "who selects" according to the theory of evolution, and I gave you the answer.
38 posted on
04/15/2006 12:20:21 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: SirLinksalot
This example you gave Does not undermine Intelligent Design at all. Nothing can undermine ID. That's part of the reason it's not science.
To: SirLinksalot
It is not possible to undermine ID. That's the problem with it.
To: SirLinksalot; Alter Kaker
AK:
The environment and potential sexual partners each select. SLal: Nope the question still remains these could simply predesigned traits that existed in these sexual partners. "After their own kind" as the book of Genesis would say.
This example you gave Does not undermine Intelligent Design at all.
I have to go with SirLinksalot on this one. In fact, I'd go further: there's no example at all that can undermine ID. That's why it's not science.
123 posted on
04/15/2006 1:36:11 PM PDT by
Gumlegs
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson